2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00848e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches for measuring the surface areas of metal oxide electrocatalysts for determining their intrinsic electrocatalytic activity

Abstract: A summary and analysis of approaches for measuring the surface areas of metal oxide electrocatalysts for evaluating their intrinsic electrocatalytic activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
427
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 604 publications
(449 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
21
427
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, LSV curves which current densities were normalized to ECSA of pure metal catalysts and mass activity were illustrated in Figures S53 and S54 of the Supporting Information. It further confirms the intrinsic activity of RhCu NTs is better than that of other samples (Figure S53, Supporting Information) . Finally, polarization curves have no significant changes after 3000 cycles test in wide pH value (Figures S55–S57, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Moreover, LSV curves which current densities were normalized to ECSA of pure metal catalysts and mass activity were illustrated in Figures S53 and S54 of the Supporting Information. It further confirms the intrinsic activity of RhCu NTs is better than that of other samples (Figure S53, Supporting Information) . Finally, polarization curves have no significant changes after 3000 cycles test in wide pH value (Figures S55–S57, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…That is to say, the evaluation of OER activity without consideration of involved population of active species is biased. Although researchers in related fields attempt to clarify this ambiguousness and to propose a benchmarking protocol to define the population of active sites and the activity of individual sites of electrocatalysts, a criterion to implement a fair comparison of electrocatalytic activity has not yet been proposed . Herein, a series of cobalt derivate‐based electrocatalysts for OER is taken as an example to probe the correlation within electrocatalytic behavior, electrocatalytic activity and population of active sites.…”
Section: Relevant Important Parameters For Oer Electrocatalysts In 1 mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This result is predictable because the difference in surface area of the substrate creates difference in population of reactive sites. It had been pointed out that the evaluation of OER activity should take into account the surface areas of corresponding catalysts . Several methodologies have been proposed to estimate the surface areas, such as physical surface areas by Brunauer‐ Emmett‐Teller (BET) theory or electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) by cyclic voltammograms .…”
Section: Relevant Important Parameters For Oer Electrocatalysts In 1 mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We evaluated the specific activities calculated on the basis of BET surface area obtained by means of gas desorption for Ni‐V 2 O 3 and Ni nanopowders. The BET surface area is a reasonable representative of the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) on the ink‐casted electrode for powders . As shown by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (Figure S14), the BET surface areas of Ni‐V 2 O 3 and Ni are 16.8250 m 2 g −1 and 8.0787 m 2 g −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 85%