1994
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/59.1.253s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to analysis of dietary data: relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology

Abstract: Dietary intake cannot be estimated without error and probably never will be. The nature and magnitude of the error depends on both the dietary data collection methodology and the subjects studied. The impact of particular types of error depends on the question being asked and the analytical methodology used to address it. Examples of these phenomena are presented in this review paper. The future lies in improved estimation and understanding of the error terms and in the development of analytical and statistica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
141
0
33

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
141
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the clinical relevance of our results are scarce because of the small, albeit significant regression coefficients for some variables, However, it has been recognised that it is impossible to estimate the dietary intake of individuals without error and that the high random error associated with estimates of nutrient intake biases the correlation coefficients and slopes of regression lines toward zero [45]. Thus, the effect on HbA 1c of dietary intake is likely to be larger than estimated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It could be argued that the clinical relevance of our results are scarce because of the small, albeit significant regression coefficients for some variables, However, it has been recognised that it is impossible to estimate the dietary intake of individuals without error and that the high random error associated with estimates of nutrient intake biases the correlation coefficients and slopes of regression lines toward zero [45]. Thus, the effect on HbA 1c of dietary intake is likely to be larger than estimated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Systematic error results in a consistent over-or under-estimation in activity levels across the sample, while random error occurs when over-and under-estimations are made for an individual's estimation of their true mean; however across the sample these errors occur randomly. 1 Error may result from measurement validity issues, such as over-or underreporting of activity, or from large intra-individual variability in daily activity patterns, making it difficult to measure the true mean. [2][3][4][5] Therefore, activity measured on a single day is likely to be a poor estimate of activity over a week, a month or a year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When predicting or comparing means from independent samples, random intra-individual variability across a sample will not bias estimated group means. 1,6 The main impact of intra-individual variation in these situations is to increase total variance, therefore decreasing statistical power, making it more difficult to detect a true difference between groups. 1 When regression or correlational analyses are performed (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely acknowledged that dietary intake cannot be measured without a degree of error (Beaton, 1994). Nonetheless, the identification of certain sources of error and consequent strategies aimed at minimizing and limiting their impact has the potential to improve statistical power and to minimize bias in dietary intake studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%