2014
DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000048
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to Enhancing Radiation Safety in Cardiovascular Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Several techniques can be used to keep radiation ALARA. 68 Their under utilization in contemporary practice provides nuclear cardiology laboratories with multiple opportunities to improve patient care. 69,70 Where feasible, and particularly for procedures with higher radiation exposure, e.g., effective dose [20 mSv, shared decisionmaking principles should be employed, 71 including discussion of options with the patient.…”
Section: Radiotracers and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Several techniques can be used to keep radiation ALARA. 68 Their under utilization in contemporary practice provides nuclear cardiology laboratories with multiple opportunities to improve patient care. 69,70 Where feasible, and particularly for procedures with higher radiation exposure, e.g., effective dose [20 mSv, shared decisionmaking principles should be employed, 71 including discussion of options with the patient.…”
Section: Radiotracers and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Suggested approaches include utilization of appropriate use criteria, stress-only imaging, limited use of a dual isotope protocol, and PET imaging, where appropriate. Other approaches rely on recent improvements in camera hardware and software such as highsensitivity cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) solid-state detectors and iterative reconstruction resolution recovery algorithms, which can allow injection of less radiotracer and/or decrease image acquisition time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The authors of the current paper should be congratulated for their effort to explore and critically assess novel protocols. The proposed dual-isotope protocol perhaps could be recommended in carefully selected subsets of patients: Older patients (perhaps [70 years of age, in whom higher radiation dose carries minimal attributable lifetime cancer risk), 13 or patients with known CAD and/or with a need for detection of myocardial viability (in whom both stress and rest imaging is needed and a 24 hours delayed Tl-201 images may have clinical relevance).…”
Section: See Related Article Pp 513-522mentioning
confidence: 99%