2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to group decision making with incomplete information based on power geometric operators and triangular fuzzy AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linguistic terms are often represented by fuzzy numbers such as triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [23,24].…”
Section: Fuzzy Linguistic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic terms are often represented by fuzzy numbers such as triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [23,24].…”
Section: Fuzzy Linguistic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e increase of imprecision and complexity in realworld problems leads to the fact that decision-makers might be unable to express personal preferences with numerical values, so some theories dealing with imprecision are introduced into MCGDM problems, especially the theory of fuzzy sets developed by Zadeh [12]. Classical methods have been extended to solve uncertain MCGDM problems based on fuzzy sets as well as their generations, such as fuzzy TOPSIS [13], triangular fuzzy AHP [14], intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR [15], fuzzy prospect theory [16], intuitionistic fuzzy ELECTRE [17], and Pythagorean fuzzy PROMETHEE [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a classical MCDM method, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been used widely for calculating the weights of criteria [7,8,14]. e AHP requires to compare the relative importance of each two criteria and obtain a comparison matrix, but due to the complexity of comparison procedures of the AHP, as well as the limitation of human cognition, the results obtained by the AHP always lack consistency in the pairwise comparison matrix; therefore, to improve the traditional AHP, Rezaei introduced a novel pairwise comparison idea and proposed the best-worst method (BWM) [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for using TFNs in this study is that they are a suitable tool for formulating decision problems and modeling decision makers' vague and incomplete judgments. Moreover, it is easy and convenient for experts or decision makers to apply and calculate the criteria weight and normalization [32,[67][68][69][70]. The scales and related TFNs are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%