2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to patient satisfaction measurement of the healthcare food services: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 This questionnaire provides a measure of overall FS satisfaction as well as dimensions of FS satisfactionfood quality, meal service quality, staff/service issues and the physical environment with minimal risk of bias. 10 The survey also supports reporting on length of stay (LOS) and patients' reported oral intake as compared with usual intake. 11 Although there are limitations with this survey given the transformations in FS that have occurred since it was developed in 2005, the consistency in using the same comprehensive validated tool enables different FS models and variables to be compared.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 This questionnaire provides a measure of overall FS satisfaction as well as dimensions of FS satisfactionfood quality, meal service quality, staff/service issues and the physical environment with minimal risk of bias. 10 The survey also supports reporting on length of stay (LOS) and patients' reported oral intake as compared with usual intake. 11 Although there are limitations with this survey given the transformations in FS that have occurred since it was developed in 2005, the consistency in using the same comprehensive validated tool enables different FS models and variables to be compared.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The ACHFPSQ is a validated and widely used tool in Australia to assess patient satisfaction with FS quality developed by the Qld FS Interest Group in 2005 11 . This questionnaire provides a measure of overall FS satisfaction as well as dimensions of FS satisfaction – food quality, meal service quality, staff/service issues and the physical environment with minimal risk of bias 10 . The survey also supports reporting on length of stay (LOS) and patients' reported oral intake as compared with usual intake 11 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the current study, most hospitals relied only on patient satisfaction surveys, and only a few collected data on plate food waste and nutrition care reports. Patient satisfaction surveys tend to only capture perceived quality based on the satisfaction of the patients and tend to induce social desirability bias 31 . Meanwhile, these public hospitals have limited plate food waste data which is a good indicator of meal quality and adequacy of patient intake 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient satisfaction surveys tend to only capture perceived quality based on the satisfaction of the patients and tend to induce social desirability bias. 31 Meanwhile, these public hospitals have limited plate food waste data which is a good indicator of meal quality and adequacy of patient intake. 32 The gap in implementation of nutrition care process reports reflects the hospital's lack of adherence to another national policy aiming to closely monitor and provide interventions for nutritionally-at-risk patients upon admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%