2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to the assessment of adherence to CBT-I, predictors of adherence, and the association of adherence to outcomes: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, this review depicted participants’ completion of various questionnaires and assessments. However, because of the limited number of studies that reported the same outcome measure on treatment adherence, we failed to summarize how participants implemented treatment recommendations and how therapists followed treatment protocols, which are important factors in treatment adherence [ 95 ]. The impact of treatment adherence on eHealth-based psychosocial interventions is worth investigating, and future RCTs should use standardized methods to comprehensively assess treatment adherence and its relationship with treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, this review depicted participants’ completion of various questionnaires and assessments. However, because of the limited number of studies that reported the same outcome measure on treatment adherence, we failed to summarize how participants implemented treatment recommendations and how therapists followed treatment protocols, which are important factors in treatment adherence [ 95 ]. The impact of treatment adherence on eHealth-based psychosocial interventions is worth investigating, and future RCTs should use standardized methods to comprehensively assess treatment adherence and its relationship with treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both treatments, participants’ daily adherence with bedtimes and rise times was determined by comparing the target times determined during the intervention session with the times recorded by the participant in the daily sleep diary. Although there is no universally accepted definition of sleep schedule adherence (Mellor et al, 2022), we used prior research on the topic to develop study-specific criteria (Matthews et al, 2012). Bedtime was coded as adherent if it was no more than 15 min earlier than the target time (otherwise it was not adherent ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, insomnia patients with evening chronotype, unhelpful beliefs about sleep, short sleep, comorbidity, or high reactivity to stress may have a blunted response to CBT-I [ 12 15 ], possibly due to the influence of overactive neurobiological and psychological systems in insomnia pathophysiology [ 16 ]. Adherence to the therapeutic regime may also predict outcome [ 17 ]. Thus, a secondary objective of this study is to conduct exploratory analyses to identify factors influencing the effectiveness of group-delivered CBT-I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%