2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-018-1892-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to the Optimal Nonlinear Analysis of Microcalorimeter Pulses

Abstract: We consider how to analyze microcalorimeter pulses for quantities that are nonlinear in the data, while preserving the signal-to-noise advantages of linear optimal filtering. We successfully apply our chosen approach to compute the electrothermal feedback energy deficit (the "Joule energy") of a pulse, which has been proposed as a linear estimator of the deposited photon energy.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the E J metric produces nearly linear calibration functions, it may simplify calibration measurements and analysis and produce more accurate results. In a companion paper in this issue, a low-noise estimator of the E J metric is presented that produces Mn, Co, and Cu Kα spectra with energy resolutions comparable to the OFPH results on test 19 . Our next step will be to compare the accuracy and speed of the full calibration procedures using OFPH, the low-noise E J estimator, and other proposed alternative calibration metrics such as resistance-space 15 16 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the E J metric produces nearly linear calibration functions, it may simplify calibration measurements and analysis and produce more accurate results. In a companion paper in this issue, a low-noise estimator of the E J metric is presented that produces Mn, Co, and Cu Kα spectra with energy resolutions comparable to the OFPH results on test 19 . Our next step will be to compare the accuracy and speed of the full calibration procedures using OFPH, the low-noise E J estimator, and other proposed alternative calibration metrics such as resistance-space 15 16 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The direct application to individual, noisy pulse records of the formulas here will yield linear, but highly noisy estimations of E γ . We treat the problem of their statistically optimal estimation in a companion paper in these same proceedings 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ì 𝑚 𝑡; ì 𝜉 (and C 𝑡, 𝑡 ; ì 𝜉 if the noise is not stationary) can be challenging to construct as continuous functions of their parameters. Generative physical models [110,111], principal component analyses [112][113][114], and template interpolation [115,116] have been suggested as ways to properly formulate these functions. Nevertheless, solving equa tion 3.10 then becomes a nonlinear optimization problem which cannot be solved in real time.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 However, r (t; ξ) and C(t, t ; ξ) can be challenging to construct as continuous functions of their parameters. Generative physical models, 22,23 principal component analyses, 7,24 and template interpolation 25,26 have been suggested as ways to properly formulate these functions. However, minimizing equation 6 then becomes a nonlinear optimization problem which cannot be solved in real-time.…”
Section: Photon Energy Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%