2016
DOI: 10.2134/ael2015.12.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching Brine Spill Remediation from the Surface: A New In Situ Method

Abstract: Core Ideas In situ remediation of brine spills is possible via surface extraction of salts. A crystallization inhibitor allowed for 29 to 57% of salts to be harvested from the soil surface. Methods for surface extraction of salts can aid in expediting brine spill remediation timelines. Well drilling for energy resources innately produces brine waters. These brines often contain sodium in the 10,000 to >100,000 mg L−1 range. In situ soil remediation of brine spills traditionally consists of diluting salts wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, other crystallization inhibitors with low toxicity reaction products may produce similar salt extraction rates. Therefore, hexacyanoferrate is used here only as an example of a crystallization inhibitor for remediating brine spills (Daigh and Klaustermeier, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, other crystallization inhibitors with low toxicity reaction products may produce similar salt extraction rates. Therefore, hexacyanoferrate is used here only as an example of a crystallization inhibitor for remediating brine spills (Daigh and Klaustermeier, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimize crystallization inhibitor loading rate and application method for various soil textures, five concentrations of crystallization inhibitor (control, 0.00001, 0.0001, 0.001, and 0.01 M) in the mineral form were applied to NaCl‐contaminated soils (i.e., the sandy loam, loam, and silty clay) using the T1, T2, and T3 methods of application. The 0.01 M concentration applied with the T3 method was reported by Daigh and Klaustermeier (2016) as preliminary data; this data is presented here for comparison with the other experimental treatments. In the T1 and T2 application methods, the mixed NaCl, crystallization inhibitor, and NH 3 solution applied to the soil columns consisted of 34.75 g of NaCl, the crystallization inhibitor at a corresponding molar concentration in 110 mL of DI water, and 20 mL of a 0.01 g g −1 ammonium hydroxide solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations