2019
DOI: 10.1080/17489725.2018.1564383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching location-based services from a place-based perspective: from data to services?

Abstract: Despite the seemingly obvious importance of a link between notions of place and the provision of context in locationbased services (LBS), truly place-based LBS remain rare. Place is attractive as a concept for designing services as it focuses on ways in which people, rather than machines, represent and talk about places. We review papers which have extracted place-relevant information from a variety of sources, examining their rationales, the data sources used, the characteristics of the data under study and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(118 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What is desirable behavior for a mobile phone in a classroom or supermarket differs considerably [44], and a smart office [34] has different information provisioning requirements from a smart hospital [33]. The de-facto stan-dard that emerged were ontology-based approaches [72,151,178] connecting the previous more network-centered notion of context awareness to the established formalisms of the knowledge representation area, in particular, to the description language formalisms [12] in the KL-ONE tradition [19] that constitute the de-facto standard in web ontologies through the web ontology language OWL [85,131]. The advantages of this standardization process are particularly in interoperability: ontologies about a certain domain can be used in any application in the domain [105,137].…”
Section: Modeling and Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is desirable behavior for a mobile phone in a classroom or supermarket differs considerably [44], and a smart office [34] has different information provisioning requirements from a smart hospital [33]. The de-facto stan-dard that emerged were ontology-based approaches [72,151,178] connecting the previous more network-centered notion of context awareness to the established formalisms of the knowledge representation area, in particular, to the description language formalisms [12] in the KL-ONE tradition [19] that constitute the de-facto standard in web ontologies through the web ontology language OWL [85,131]. The advantages of this standardization process are particularly in interoperability: ontologies about a certain domain can be used in any application in the domain [105,137].…”
Section: Modeling and Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar way as the computer graphics formats which implemented the first GISystems gave rise to the interdisciplinary dialogues that started GIScience and spatial information science as a subdiscipline of geography and computer science, the architectures and choices used to implement location-aware systems require a new active dialogue. Much of what, for instance, under the notion of place-based GIS is currently gaining traction would benefit from a local, privacy-preserving perspective of LAS as local implementations rather than global web-based services [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maka metode location based service diusulkan untuk menyelesaikan masalah tersebut. Dengan metode penentuan tempat yang memberikan informasi yang relevan sesuai dengan pendaftaran titik koordinat lokasi sentra industri yang terintegrasi dengan google map memudahkan user dalam pencarian lokasi terdekat [3]. Selain itu dengan memakai platform android, informasi akan lebih mudah untuk diakses melalui handphone.…”
unclassified