2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching the “real” state of elasmobranch fisheries and trade: A case study from the Mediterranean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the data and the observations new reported here, we noticed that professional fishers communicated (caught) elasmobranchs listed as Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List in 67% of the cases, whereas this percentage decreased to 52% when analysing data provided by recreational fishers. These numbers agree with other Mediterranean studies; for example, about 50-60% of the elasmobranch landings in Greek sites were threatened species [55]. However, it is also possible that fishers mostly communicated to us species perceived as rare, while other common taxa (such as, for example, Raja species) were usually considered as of "no interest".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Apart from the data and the observations new reported here, we noticed that professional fishers communicated (caught) elasmobranchs listed as Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List in 67% of the cases, whereas this percentage decreased to 52% when analysing data provided by recreational fishers. These numbers agree with other Mediterranean studies; for example, about 50-60% of the elasmobranch landings in Greek sites were threatened species [55]. However, it is also possible that fishers mostly communicated to us species perceived as rare, while other common taxa (such as, for example, Raja species) were usually considered as of "no interest".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As concerns the COI gene, the newly generated sequences enlarge the dataset already available for the Mediterranean electric rays [ 1 , 35 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ], with the addition of seven new haplotypes ( Table 1 and Table S2 ). Similarly, 21 new NADH2 haplotypes were added to the few available for Mediterranean T. marmorata , and for the first time a total of 12 NADH2 haplotypes were obtained from T. nobiliana and T. torpedo specimens of Mediterranean origin (see Table 1 and Table S2 for details).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the legislation mentioned above, the Action Plan for the Conservation of Cartilaginous Fishes (Chondrichthyans) in the Mediterranean Sea [67] provide a framework for species conservation and habitat protection. Despite the existence of legislation and action plans, the Mediterranean has been identified as a hotspot of elasmobranch mortality globally [5], while the compliance with relevant regulations is low throughout the basin [68,69], including within Greece [20,21].…”
Section: Species Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the angel shark populations in the Aegean are suspected to be extremely small because: (a) recent observations and reports have been scarce, (b) the species have almost no landings records in the Data Collection Framework reports 2005-2019, with only few exceptions, and (c) there are no reported angel shark landings in Greece in the official fisheries data by HELSTAT (1967HELSTAT ( -2017 [18]. The latter might be a result of the low resolution of landings, the absence of landing records from all fishing ports, as such data are collected only in a subset of landing sites, and the aggregation of many species of chondrichthyans in a few broad groups for reporting [19][20][21], given that angel sharks have been detected in the Greek fish markets [22]. Regarding the legal framework for the protection of the species from fishing activities in Greece, no provisions are foreseen on a national level, while on a European Union level it is prohibited for fishing vessels to fish for, to retain on board, to transship, or to land angel shark (Squatina squatina) in EU waters (Council Regulations (EU) 2019/124 and 2019/1241).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%