2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2011.6011929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate emotional labelling of non-acted speech using basic emotions, geneva emotion wheel and self assessment manikins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the decisions can be based on emotions, it becomes fundamentalto measure them (Damásio, 1994, cit in [2,4]). The assessment of emotions has been concentrated in measuring, objectively as well as subjectively, which emotionsstand out during the interaction with different products [22].To achieve that, self-report data has been used, mainly collected by instrumentssuch as the SelfAssessment Manikin [2]and the Geneva Emotion Wheel [9] and more objective methods based on physiological measures such as heart rate, skin conductance, among others [2].…”
Section: Assessment In Usability and User Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the decisions can be based on emotions, it becomes fundamentalto measure them (Damásio, 1994, cit in [2,4]). The assessment of emotions has been concentrated in measuring, objectively as well as subjectively, which emotionsstand out during the interaction with different products [22].To achieve that, self-report data has been used, mainly collected by instrumentssuch as the SelfAssessment Manikin [2]and the Geneva Emotion Wheel [9] and more objective methods based on physiological measures such as heart rate, skin conductance, among others [2].…”
Section: Assessment In Usability and User Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAM Arousal scale ranged from an excited and wide-eyed figure to a relaxed and sleepy figure (see, for example, Bradley and Lang, 1994). The SAM scales have been widely used in various settings, for example, with pictorial stimuli (Backs et al, 2005), auditory stimuli (Siegert et al, 2011), in applied fields such as advertising studies (Morris, 1995), and also in the study of social processes (e.g., Kirsch et al, 2005; Coan et al, 2006; Kolassa and Miltner, 2006; Buckner et al, 2010). The validity of the SAM Valence and Arousal scales were established in a study by Bradley and Lang (1994) which reported significant correlations with the Semantic Differential Scale.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the presentation of each video, the participants were provided enough time to rate the music videos on a discrete 9-point scale for valence, arousal, dominance, and liking. Valence, arousal, and dominance dimensions were scored using the self-assessment manikins (SAM) to gouge user emotional states (Siegert et al, 2011 ). For liking (i.e., how much did you like the video?…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%