Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-negative infections: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThe rapid global spread of multi-resistant bacteria and loss of antibiotic effectiveness increases the risk of initial inappropriate antibiotic therapy (IAT) and poses a serious threat to patient safety. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to summarize the effect of appropriate antibiotic therapy (AAT) or IAT against gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospital setting.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched until May 2014 to identify English-language studies examining use of AAT or IAT in hospitalized patients with Gram-negative pathogens. Outcomes of interest included mortality, clinical cure, cost, and length of stay. Citations and eligible full-text articles were screened in duplicate. Random effect models meta-analysis was used.ResultsFifty-seven studies in 60 publications were eligible. AAT was associated with lower risk of mortality (unadjusted summary odds ratio [OR] 0.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.47, 39 studies, 5809 patients) and treatment failure (OR 0.22, 95 % CI 0.14–0.35; 3 studies, 283 patients). Conversely, IAT increased risk of mortality (unadjusted summary OR 2.66, 95 % CI 2.12–3.35; 39 studies, 5809 patients). In meta-analyses of adjusted data, AAT was associated with lower risk of mortality (adjusted summary OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.23–0.83; 6 studies, 1409 patients). Conversely, IAT increased risk of mortality (adjusted summary OR 3.30, 95 % CI 2.42–4.49; 16 studies, 2493 patients). A limited number of studies suggested higher cost and longer hospital stay with IAT. There was considerable heterogeneity in the definition of AAT or IAT, pathogens studied, and outcomes assessed.DiscussionUsing a large set of studies we found that IAT is associated with a number of serious consequences,including an increased risk of hospital mortality. Infections caused by drug-resistant, Gram-negative organisms represent a considerable financial burden to healthcare systems due to the increased costs associated with the resources required to manage the infection, particularly longer hospital stays. However, there were insufficient data that evaluated AAT for the outcome of costs among patients with nosocomialGram-negative infections.ConclusionsIAT in hospitalized patients with Gram-negative infections is associated with adverse outcomes. Technological advances for rapid diagnostics to facilitate AAT along with antimicrobial stewardship, surveillance, infection control, and prevention is needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1123-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Focussing on resistance to front-line drugs is the most effective way to combat the antimicrobial resistance crisis

“…2). This model output matches previous clinical studies which demonstrate the positive impact of prompt appropriate antimicrobial therapy on morbidity and mortality 26 . We note however, that in the absence of other interventions both front-line and last-line diagnostics have no effect on the fitness of MDR strains – there is no advantage to knowing that these strains are resistant when there is no alternative drug to which they are sensitive (Supplementary Fig.…”

Risk factors for multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacteria infection in intensive care units: A meta‐analysis

“…Sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the stability and reliability of the results. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's and Begg's tests (Raman, Avendano, Berger, & Menon, ): P >0.05 was taken to indicate no publication bias.…”

Antimicrobial resistance rates in gram-positive bacteria do not drive glycopeptides use

“…Of great concern is the increased mortality rate reported in patients with severe infections and inappropriate antibiotic therapy [22–24] that ranged from 11% to 72% of treated patients. A gold standard to increase rationale antibiotic usage and implement antimicrobial stewardship programmes however does not exist.…”