2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-019-01755-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate monetary policy and forecast disagreement at the FOMC

Abstract: Research Question The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the conduct of monetary policy to, put simple, keep prices stable and employment high. Yet, members of the FOMC are not only in charge of setting interest rates but also of making forecasts for key macroeconomic variables, in particular for the future developments in the inflation rate and the unemployment rate. The present study aims to investigate how dissenting views on appropriate monetary policy tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work on the forecast heterogeneity of monetary policy committee member is related to a broader literature about monetary policy disagreement based on political affiliation (Bordo & Istrefi, 2018), career backgrounds (Eichler & Lahner, 2014), and regional conditions (Coibion & Goldstein, 2012; Jung & Latsos, 2015; Meade & Sheets, 2005). Policy preferences and forecast disagreement interact in important ways; for example, hawkishness is associated with higher‐than‐consensus inflation forecasts (Bennani et al., 2018; Eichler & Lahner, 2014; McCracken, 2010; Schultefrankenfeld, 2020). Moreover, non‐voting FOMC members may have strategic motives in forecasting, as they systematically overpredict inflation relative to the consensus if they prefer tighter monetary policy (Tillmann, 2011) and “anti‐herd” their inflation forecasts (Rülke & Tillmann, 2011).…”
Section: Forecasting Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work on the forecast heterogeneity of monetary policy committee member is related to a broader literature about monetary policy disagreement based on political affiliation (Bordo & Istrefi, 2018), career backgrounds (Eichler & Lahner, 2014), and regional conditions (Coibion & Goldstein, 2012; Jung & Latsos, 2015; Meade & Sheets, 2005). Policy preferences and forecast disagreement interact in important ways; for example, hawkishness is associated with higher‐than‐consensus inflation forecasts (Bennani et al., 2018; Eichler & Lahner, 2014; McCracken, 2010; Schultefrankenfeld, 2020). Moreover, non‐voting FOMC members may have strategic motives in forecasting, as they systematically overpredict inflation relative to the consensus if they prefer tighter monetary policy (Tillmann, 2011) and “anti‐herd” their inflation forecasts (Rülke & Tillmann, 2011).…”
Section: Forecasting Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%