2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate Wood Constitutive Law for Simulation of Nonlinear Behavior of Timber Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…whether in tension or compression). In general, the three most failure modes are [12]: (i)ductile failure due to compression parallel to the grain, (ii) ductile failure due to compression perpendicular to the grain, and (iii) brittle failure due to shear parallel to the grain and tension perpendicular to the grain. Fig.…”
Section: Background On the Nonlinear Behaviour Of Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…whether in tension or compression). In general, the three most failure modes are [12]: (i)ductile failure due to compression parallel to the grain, (ii) ductile failure due to compression perpendicular to the grain, and (iii) brittle failure due to shear parallel to the grain and tension perpendicular to the grain. Fig.…”
Section: Background On the Nonlinear Behaviour Of Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, its implementation is generally feasible only for discrete crack modelling, which requires an a priori definition of the cracking path severely limiting its applicability to simulate most timber joints (commonly dowelled connections) subject to cyclic loading where the crack locations are not known in advance. The second approach, and the one followed herein, is based on CDM theory [11,12,13] and represents a practical alternative for the definition of a plasticity-damage model for the analysis of timber structures subjected to load reversals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it normally works fine when applied to composite materials, it certainly fails when it is used to simulate the mechanical behaviour of timber because of its different strengths when working under tensile or under compressive stresses. 15,16 In the direction of the grain, under tensile stress, timber shows an elastoplastic behaviour until fibre fracture occurs; while under compressive stress, the failure is caused because the timber cells buckle and collapse. On the other hand, in the directions perpendicular to the grain, under tensile stress, timber fails when the weak links that join the fibres are unable to withstand the stresses, 17 and under compressive stress, a grain-crushing situation appears.…”
Section: Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of timber joints has attracted great attention [39]. Xu has developed the wood constitutive law for behavior of timber joints, Hoffman criterion was used in law, experiments and simulation got similar results [40][41]. A key factor in simulation is anisotropy evolution under finite strains.…”
Section: Constitutive Model Of Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%