2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriateness of choice and duration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the incidence of surgical site infections: A prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to hospital guidelines, the antibiotic choices were either first-generation (cefazolin) or second-generation (cefuroxime) cephalosporins, as they are more effective and have a narrower spectrum for infection-causing bacteria in these procedures. In our study, SAP choice was inappropriate in 15%, with non-compliance due to administering penicillins (combined with beta- In a similar study by Sefah IA et al [19] in Ghana, Thabit AK et al [20], and Piri A et al [21] in Western Iran, reasonable compliance (67.0%, 71.4%, 92.1%) with the choice of SAP to standard treatment guidelines was observed. In contrast to our study, a higher rate of inappropriateness in the selection of antibiotics for prophylaxis was observed in a study conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan by Khan Z et al [22], where compliance was only 4.2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…According to hospital guidelines, the antibiotic choices were either first-generation (cefazolin) or second-generation (cefuroxime) cephalosporins, as they are more effective and have a narrower spectrum for infection-causing bacteria in these procedures. In our study, SAP choice was inappropriate in 15%, with non-compliance due to administering penicillins (combined with beta- In a similar study by Sefah IA et al [19] in Ghana, Thabit AK et al [20], and Piri A et al [21] in Western Iran, reasonable compliance (67.0%, 71.4%, 92.1%) with the choice of SAP to standard treatment guidelines was observed. In contrast to our study, a higher rate of inappropriateness in the selection of antibiotics for prophylaxis was observed in a study conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan by Khan Z et al [22], where compliance was only 4.2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…3 Antibiotic selection is influenced by the organism most commonly causing wound infection in the specific procedure and by the relative costs of available agents. 4 Parenterally administered empirical antimicrobial for surgical inpatients is as high as 98% in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). 5 Despite the introduction of National Antibiotic Treatment Guidelines (NATG) 6 in 2014, there is still a great deal of variation in SAP administration by various surgical teams and specialties, which may have an impact on adverse events and the emergence of antibiotic resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%