Appropriating Resources: Land Claims, Law, and Illicit Business

Byrne, Edmund F.

doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1010-y

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the Native Title Act governing cultural aspects of resource development does not actually represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of thinking, instead prioritising western/settler ways of assigning value (e.g. fiscally) without taking adequate measure of the complex inter-group relationships (Byrne, 2012; Marsh, 2013). In terms of employment opportunities over the life of mines, communities around some mines still experience inconsistent benefits over the life of mining projects, with opportunities tapering off further towards mine closure (Doyle et al, 2015; Everingham et al, 2013; Tiplady and Barclay, 2003).…”

Section: Csr and Social Licence To Operate Activities Of Mining Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Returning land to country: Indigenous engagement in mined land closure and rehabilitation

Bond

Kelly

2020

Australian Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article uses stakeholder and CSR theories to intentionally and meaningfully include Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in planning for mined land rehabilitation and closure (MR&C). In the mining space, attention has been paid to securing land access, fulfilling Indigenous Land Use Agreement and Mine Participation Agreement requirements, undertaking initial consultations with communities and Traditional Owners, and setting the terms of reference for entry and mine operation. MR&C, in contrast, has been a distant priority for both mining companies and the relevant state or territory governments. Guidelines for MR&C practice is articulated even less clearly in relation to Indigenous engagement. In response to growing public pressure, the mining industry is focusing more on addressing MR&C issues. This article suggests that companies and governments engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in plans for MR&C as an upgraded standard for MR&C practice. JEL Classification: Q01, Q32

show abstract

Section: Csr and Social Licence To Operate Activities Of Mining Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Returning land to country: Indigenous engagement in mined land closure and rehabilitation

Bond

Kelly

2020

Australian Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Morality of Unequal Autonomy: Reviving Kant’s Concept of Status for Stakeholders

Castro¹

2013

J Bus Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective

Poruthiyil

2013

J Bus Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Appropriating Resources: Land Claims, Law, and Illicit Business

Cited by 4 publications

References 39 publications

Returning land to country: Indigenous engagement in mined land closure and rehabilitation

Returning land to country: Indigenous engagement in mined land closure and rehabilitation

The Morality of Unequal Autonomy: Reviving Kant’s Concept of Status for Stakeholders

Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About