1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00620660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate analytical solutions for solute transport in two-layer porous media

Abstract: Abstract. Mathematical models for transport in layered media are important for investigating how restricting layers affect rates of solute migration in soil profiles; they may also improve the analysis of solute displacement experiments. This study reports an (approximate) analytical solution for solute transport during steady-state flow in a two-layer medium requiring continuity of solute fluxes and resident concentrations at the interface. The solutions were derived with Laplace transformations making use of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the conclusion is clearly different here: the concentration can be correctly calculated only if the right transfer matrix is considered. We share the same conclusion as Leij and Van Genuchten [23]: transport phenomena in the upstream influent or downstream effluent reservoirs, as well as apparatus induced-dispersion affect breakthrough curves from a one-layer experimental column. These effects can be taken into account and analysed with the two layers solution.…”
Section: Dispersion In An Heterogeneous Porous Medium Made Of Two Semsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But the conclusion is clearly different here: the concentration can be correctly calculated only if the right transfer matrix is considered. We share the same conclusion as Leij and Van Genuchten [23]: transport phenomena in the upstream influent or downstream effluent reservoirs, as well as apparatus induced-dispersion affect breakthrough curves from a one-layer experimental column. These effects can be taken into account and analysed with the two layers solution.…”
Section: Dispersion In An Heterogeneous Porous Medium Made Of Two Semsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Attention has been paid by Kreft and Zuber [21] and Parker and Van Genuchten [30] to the choice of the boundary conditions and its consequence for the resulting solution, especially when the solution is used for parameter estimation. It is reported by Leij and Van Genuchten [23] that the predicted temporal concentration curve will be too steep if dispersion in the effluent reservoir is present but ignored. The different cases corresponding on whether the upstream and downstream limits of the medium are open or closed to diffusion are investigated by Villermaux [39], Barry and Sposito [5], Parlange et al [31] and Maillet et al [26].…”
Section: Impedances Of An Infinite Homogeneous Mediummentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the soil structure near the column exit is usually not known a priori, Parlange et al [1992] considered that the semi-infinite column or (5) defined a range of possible exit boundary conditions, with the lowest value of c r at the boundary given by the semiinfinite case, and the maximum when (5) is used. Another approach is to model a soil column as a two-layer medium (i.e., the exit apparatus is modeled as a layer with different transport properties), as investigated in various studies including Shamir and Harleman [1967], Barry and Parker [1987], Barry et al [1987a], Leij and Van Genuchten [1995], and Schwartz et al [1999].…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moench [18] pointed out that the Talbot [19] algorithm worked very well for Pe smaller than 100, but might become unstable when the function being inverted had a steep front. For the uniform flow field where the Pe is spatially constant, Bullivant and O'Sullivan [20], and Zhan et al [21][22] employed the Stehfest method to carry out the numerical inverse Laplace transform; Cornaton and Perrochet [23] and Leij et al [24] used the Crump [15] technique for the inverse Laplace transform; Schwartz et al [25] used the Weeks method; Leij et al [24], Leij and van Genuchten [26] and Gao et al [27] applied the de Hoog algorithm for the inverse Laplace transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%