2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2014.1263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate closed‐form power allocation scheme for multiple‐input–multiple‐output hybrid automatic repeat request protocols over Rayleigh block fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a power optimization perspective, incremental redundancy is more difficult to tackle than Chase combining because the power variables in (7) are contained in separate log terms 2 . The rest of the paper concentrates on incremental redundancy, except in Remark 9, Section V where the results are adapted to Chase combining.…”
Section: A Chase Combining Vs Incremental Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From a power optimization perspective, incremental redundancy is more difficult to tackle than Chase combining because the power variables in (7) are contained in separate log terms 2 . The rest of the paper concentrates on incremental redundancy, except in Remark 9, Section V where the results are adapted to Chase combining.…”
Section: A Chase Combining Vs Incremental Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full channel information of each h n is not available at the transmitter. Following [4]- [7], we assume that the transmitter only knows the distribution of h n , i.e., the value of β (hence S). Notice that all the power variables (p 1 , .…”
Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations