Blood diseases in Africa: Redressing unjust disparities is an urgent unmet need Progress in understanding human diseases is continuous: by providing new insights it has been a major factor in developing and optimizing the use of old and new drugs. As a result, the numbers of diseases that can be cured or at least significantly modified are increasing continuously. 1 This progress in quality and in quantity has not been matched by progress in the universality of access to care. Vast inequalities in health and in health services exist and persist (see Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2008; and references therein).In the past, for many countries in Africa, the main limiting factor in medical services was failure of diagnosis; nowadays, many of those countries have made efforts to train medical and other health personnel who, having made a diagnosis, are confronted with the need to prescribe drugs that are simply too expensive in relation to the patients' resources. The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 has been a powerful stimulus to the development of new drugs for rare diseases, but the incentives provided by the Act have not been reflected in price structure: as a result, for a majority of patients these diseases have remained orphans. Indeed, inequalities in access have become both greater and more glaring: however, in some cases, there have been initiatives aiming to counter this injustice. The Global Fund, founded in 2002 with the Bill and Melinda Gates being the first and main donors, spends US$4 billion a year, largely in Africa, with the specific objective to defeat HIV, tuberculosis (TB), and malaria.Here we make a call for three concrete steps that would correct at least some of the inequalities in the area of hematology.1. Adding Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) to the triad of conditions for