2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78024-5_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating Personalized Katz Centrality in Dynamic Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of walks is set to d = 6 by default. The attenuation factor α = 0.85 ∥A ∥ 2 according to the literature [5,30] where ∥A∥ 2 denotes the 2-norm of matrix A. The number of loops is set to l = 20, which is an empirical value from the experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The number of walks is set to d = 6 by default. The attenuation factor α = 0.85 ∥A ∥ 2 according to the literature [5,30] where ∥A∥ 2 denotes the 2-norm of matrix A. The number of loops is set to l = 20, which is an empirical value from the experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline algorithms we choose to compare with came from the literature [14] by Foster et al and [30] by Nathan et al and therefore we refer them as Foster and Nathan respectively hereinafter:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their algorithm achieved speedups of over two orders of magnitude over the simple algorithms that perform static recomputation every time the graph changes. Later, they improved their algorithm [182] to handle updates by using an alternative, agglomerative method of calculating Katz scores. While their static algorithm is already several orders of magnitude faster than typical linear algebra approaches, their dynamic algorithm is also faster than pure static recomputation every time the graph changes.…”
Section: Centralitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%