2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013wr013958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating snow surface temperature from standard temperature and humidity data: New possibilities for snow model and remote sensing evaluation

Abstract: [1] Snow surface temperature (T s ) is important to the snowmelt energy balance and landatmosphere interactions, but in situ measurements are rare, thus limiting evaluation of remote sensing data sets and distributed models. Here we test simple T s approximations with standard height (2-4 m) air temperature (T a ), wet-bulb temperature (T w ), and dew point temperature (T d ), which are more readily available than T s . We used hourly measurements from seven sites to understand which T s approximation is most … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Date of snowmelt was identified in these time series of soil temperatures as the day where surface soil temperature changes from a near constant measurement of <1°C to diurnally fluctuating with measurements above this temperature (Lundquist and Lott , Raleigh et al. ). In the 6 yr of data collection, 9.5% of our sensors failed, in which cases date of snowmelt was interpolated using a linear regression model applied to all sensors (as plot‐level differences in snowmelt date were extremely consistent from year to year – model R 2 were >90%; Kroiss and HilleRisLambers ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Date of snowmelt was identified in these time series of soil temperatures as the day where surface soil temperature changes from a near constant measurement of <1°C to diurnally fluctuating with measurements above this temperature (Lundquist and Lott , Raleigh et al. ). In the 6 yr of data collection, 9.5% of our sensors failed, in which cases date of snowmelt was interpolated using a linear regression model applied to all sensors (as plot‐level differences in snowmelt date were extremely consistent from year to year – model R 2 were >90%; Kroiss and HilleRisLambers ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T snow is also the primary control of longwave radiation emitted from the snowpack. However, T snow is difficult to directly measure and is therefore estimated as a function of the dew-point (frost-point) temperature, T dew , as demonstrated by Raleigh et al (2013). Using T dew to estimate daily averages of T snow reduces bias and is a reasonable first-order approximation at standard height measurements (Raleigh et al, 2013).…”
Section: Snow Surface Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13) determines the stability of the atmosphere, and where values are greater than 0.2, this decoupling occurs. Although there is no consensus on what threshold this critical value should be, we use a threshold of 0.2 (Raleigh et al, 2013). Over the course of the study the Ri B value within each cover type at the Low and Mid elevation sites and the High Forest site exceeds the critical value for the majority of days.…”
Section: Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such methods are most likely sensitive towards a range of factors, such as land cover and exposition (which strongly influence the true surface temperature), so they should be carefully developed and validated for a range of sites. Based on in situ measurements, Raleigh et al (2013) suggest that snow-covered ground dew point temperatures are a better approximation for surface temperatures compared to air temperatures at standard height. However, observations on Samoylov Island display only a small offset between snow surface and air temperatures, with the difference increasing from near zero in early winter to about 1 • C in late winter (Table 3, Langer et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Surface Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%