2005
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating the coalescent with recombination

Abstract: The coalescent with recombination describes the distribution of genealogical histories and resulting patterns of genetic variation in samples of DNA sequences from natural populations. However, using the model as the basis for inference is currently severely restricted by the computational challenge of estimating the likelihood. We discuss why the coalescent with recombination is so challenging to work with and explore whether simpler models, under which inference is more tractable, may prove useful for geneal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
429
0
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
429
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches, such as diffusion approximations for demographic inference (@a@i) (Gutenkunst et al 2009), use the probability density of the site frequency spectrum (SFS) under a given demographic model and parameterization to calculate the likelihood of the observed SFS (Marth et al 2004;Gutenkunst et al 2009), thereby allowing for optimization of model parameters. More recently, methods based on the sequentially Markovian coalescent (SMC) (McVean and Cardin 2005;Marjoram and Wall 2006) have been devised (Li and Durbin 2011;Sheehan et al 2013;Schiffels and Durbin 2014), to infer how a population's size has changed over time through the description of patterns of genetic variation along a recombining chromosome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches, such as diffusion approximations for demographic inference (@a@i) (Gutenkunst et al 2009), use the probability density of the site frequency spectrum (SFS) under a given demographic model and parameterization to calculate the likelihood of the observed SFS (Marth et al 2004;Gutenkunst et al 2009), thereby allowing for optimization of model parameters. More recently, methods based on the sequentially Markovian coalescent (SMC) (McVean and Cardin 2005;Marjoram and Wall 2006) have been devised (Li and Durbin 2011;Sheehan et al 2013;Schiffels and Durbin 2014), to infer how a population's size has changed over time through the description of patterns of genetic variation along a recombining chromosome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar dessas informações serem relevantes para a realização de estudos de mapeamento associativo, é desejável obter uma visão do DL sob o ponto de vista genealógico (Nordborg and Tavaré, 2002;Zöllner and von Haeseler, 2000;McVean, 2002;McVean and Cardin, 2005;McVean, 2007a), considerando as possíveis relações evolutivas entre sequências de DNA. Nesse sentido, a teoria da coalescência, que realiza inferências do presente em direção ao passado (Hudson, 1990;Fu and Li, 1999;Wakeley, 2009), poder ser bastante útil para a caracterização do DL em painéis de associação, principalmente para espécies que possuem poucas informações de genealogias.…”
Section: Desequilíbrio De Ligaçãounclassified
“…Neste contexto, é fundamental saber aquilo que de fato está sendo estimado, pois, no primeiro o caso, µ é a taxa de mutação por geração, indivíduo e para cada sítio, enquanto que, no segundo caso, µ é a taxa de mutação por geração, indivíduo e região cromossômica (Fu and Li, 1999;Nordborg, 2007;Nordborg and Tavaré, 2002;Hein et al, 2004;McVean and Cardin, 2005;Wakeley, 2009). De qualquer forma, normalmente o interesse está no parâmetro θ, pois é muito difícil distinguir N e e µ a partir dos dados sem informações históricas prévias.…”
Section: Mutaçãounclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations