2019
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2018.2838054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating the Steady-State Periodic Solutions of Contractive Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, contractive systems entrain (see e.g. Coogan and Margaliot [2018]). However, nonlinear systems do not necessarily entrain.…”
Section: Applications To Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, contractive systems entrain (see e.g. Coogan and Margaliot [2018]). However, nonlinear systems do not necessarily entrain.…”
Section: Applications To Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such systems have convergence properties that can be defined using a generalization of Equation ( 6) (a generalization containing an expression of the form C∥p 1 (0) − p 2 (0)∥ instead of the constant C) [65,66]. Perturbation and approximation bounds for both regular [67,68] and singular [69] perturbations of contrac-tive systems have been derived. Whereas this perturbation theory developed within the domain of differential equations independently of Markov chain theory, there appear to be possibilities for cross-fertilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrainment in nonlinear systems is non-trivial to prove. A typical proof is based on contraction theory [ 6 , 7 ], yet this type of proof provides no information on the attractive periodic solution, except for its period (see [ 39 ] for some related considerations). Nevertheless, we show here that determining the gain of entrainment can be cast as an optimal control problem .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%