1999
DOI: 10.1006/jagm.1999.1042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation Algorithms for Directed Steiner Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
389
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
389
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Above, we discussed the solutions to GST-1. As also pointed in [22], all the algorithms [19,5,16,8,23] can not be directly used to compute GST-k, because they all need to compute/sort all group Steiner trees, in order to find the minimum cost GST-k. They cannot terminate any early and report GST-k in a progress manner [22].…”
Section: Spanning and Cleanupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Above, we discussed the solutions to GST-1. As also pointed in [22], all the algorithms [19,5,16,8,23] can not be directly used to compute GST-k, because they all need to compute/sort all group Steiner trees, in order to find the minimum cost GST-k. They cannot terminate any early and report GST-k in a progress manner [22].…”
Section: Spanning and Cleanupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So in the time complexity given in Table 1, the l components are less important (l log n), but the n components are very important, even more important than the m components (m n 2 ). Regarding the n components (for fixed l), the time complexity of all the algorithms [19,5,16,8,9,15] is at least O(n 2 ), which makes them difficult to be efficiently applied to a large graph G with millions of nodes. The exemption is [23], but its performance ratio is unbounded.…”
Section: A New Parameterized Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations