2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11424-014-2157-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation algorithms for the priority facility location problem with penalties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For uncapacitated FLPP , a 3-factor approximation using primal dual techniques was given by Charikar et al [20] which was subsequently improved to 2 by Jain et al [16] using dual-fitting and greedy approach. Wang et al [23] also gave a 2-factor approximation using a combination of primal-dual and greedy technique. Later Xu and Xu [26] gave a 2 + 2/e using LP rounding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For uncapacitated FLPP , a 3-factor approximation using primal dual techniques was given by Charikar et al [20] which was subsequently improved to 2 by Jain et al [16] using dual-fitting and greedy approach. Wang et al [23] also gave a 2-factor approximation using a combination of primal-dual and greedy technique. Later Xu and Xu [26] gave a 2 + 2/e using LP rounding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PTAS for FLPO was given by Friggstad et al [9] using multiswap local search for a restricted variant of the problem with uniform facility opening costs and doubling metrics. Recently, Wang et al [23] gave a 2 factor approximation using a combination of primal dual and greedy schema for the general setting. To the best of our knowledge, capacitated FLPO has not been studied earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing approximation algorithms for clustering with priorities remains an active area of research. For example, several constant factor approximation algorithms are known for the facility location objective [1][2][3]. Unfortunately, clustering with priorities remains elusive under the extensively studied k-median objective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%