2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38016-7_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation Algorithms for the Wafer to Wafer Integration Problem

Abstract: Motivated by the yield optimization problem in semiconductor manufacturing, we model the wafer to wafer integration problem as a special multi-dimensional assignment problem (called WWI-m), and study it from an approximation point of view. We give approximation algorithms achieving an approximation factor of 3 2 and 4 3 for WWI-3, and we show that extensions of these algorithms to the case of arbitrary m do not give constant factor approximations. We argue that a special case of the yield optimization problem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we also noticed in [3] that the natural ILP formulation implied that min 0 and max 1 are polynomial for fixed p. Concerning negative results, the implicit straightforward reduction from k-Dimensional Matching in [3] and made explicit in Appendix A, shows that min 0 is NP-hard, and max 1 is O(…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, we also noticed in [3] that the natural ILP formulation implied that min 0 and max 1 are polynomial for fixed p. Concerning negative results, the implicit straightforward reduction from k-Dimensional Matching in [3] and made explicit in Appendix A, shows that min 0 is NP-hard, and max 1 is O(…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In [3] and [4] we investigated the min 0 problem by providing a 4 3 -approximation algorithm for m = 3 and several f (m)-approximation algorithms for arbitrary m (and for a more general profit function c). Furthermore, we also noticed in [3] that the natural ILP formulation implied that min 0 and max 1 are polynomial for fixed p. Concerning negative results, the implicit straightforward reduction from k-Dimensional Matching in [3] and made explicit in Appendix A, shows that min 0 is NP-hard, and max 1 is O(…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [5], authors focus on a generalization of min 0, called Multi Dimensional Vector Assignment, where vectors are not necessary binary vectors. They extend the approximation algorithm of [4] to get a f (m)-approximation algorithm for arbitrary m. They also prove the APXcompleteness of the (min 0) #0≤2 for m = 3. This result was the only known inapproximability result for min 0.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The composition of sum and max operators in the cost function (1.1) is superficially reminiscent of max-algebra formulations of assignment problems, such as those discussed in [2] or [4]. To the best of our knowledge, however, the approximability of MVA has only been previously investigated by Dokka et al [6], who mostly focused on the case m = 3 with additive cost functions. The present paper extends to MVA-m, m ≥ 3, and considerably strengthens the results presented in [6].…”
Section: Wafer-to-wafer Integration and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%