2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation and numerical realization of 3D quasistatic contact problems with Coulomb friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This proceeding extends the results of Haslinger et al [7] and [8] from unilateral 2D and 3D problems to multibody contact case. One can read more about the formulation for unilateral contact in [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This proceeding extends the results of Haslinger et al [7] and [8] from unilateral 2D and 3D problems to multibody contact case. One can read more about the formulation for unilateral contact in [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…One can read more about the formulation for unilateral contact in [8,9]. Our notation of the multibody case is similar to the prepared article [3] on transient problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter case, the problem is still a box constrained QP since it contains only polyhedral constraints. In (Haslinger et al, 2012) the authors propose a successive approximation technique in 3D with the special solver of (Kučera, 2007(Kučera, , 2008 which is itself an extension to disk constraints of the Polyak method (conjugate gradient with active set on the bounds constraint) and its improvements (Dostál, 1997;Dostál and Schöberl, 2005). Other improvements of the method may be found in (Dostál and Kučera, 2010) with a last improvement of the method in (Dostál and Kozubek, 2012).…”
Section: Successive Approximation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to avoid working with the space H 1 / 2 ( Γ 2 ) defined by (see e.g. [30], [31], [32])…”
Section: Variational Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%