“…We will reason similar to the complex case in the proof of Proposition 2.9, p. 38 in [20], taking into account that f : H → H can be written componentwise as 4 and that applying the Lemma 3.17, p. 66 in [15] to f is equivalent to apply it to each real-valued function of four real variables f k (x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 ), k = 1, 2, 3, 4. By using the componentwise form, since f is entire slice regular it follows that it is continuous on H and it is immediate that lim r→1 −1 f (rq) = f (q), for all q ∈ H. Now, for f ∈ F p α (H), changing the variable rq = w and taking into account that as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 in [12], we have dm(q) = 1 r 4 dm(w), we obtain…”