1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01460046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation of differentiable functions on a Hilbert space. III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations on Moulis's results can be found in [7], although there is a gap in the proof of the generalization of [10, Theorem 2] claimed in [8] and announced in [6]. Indeed, in [6,7] Heble makes a (correct) proof for the C kfine approximation of C k -smooth maps by C ∞ maps on a dense subset D of X , and then he claims to show that in fact D = X , but this last part of the proof is wrong.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations on Moulis's results can be found in [7], although there is a gap in the proof of the generalization of [10, Theorem 2] claimed in [8] and announced in [6]. Indeed, in [6,7] Heble makes a (correct) proof for the C kfine approximation of C k -smooth maps by C ∞ maps on a dense subset D of X , and then he claims to show that in fact D = X , but this last part of the proof is wrong.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in [6,7] Heble makes a (correct) proof for the C kfine approximation of C k -smooth maps by C ∞ maps on a dense subset D of X , and then he claims to show that in fact D = X , but this last part of the proof is wrong. In [8], he claims that he can extend the result in [7] from D to all of X ; this proof is also flawed and it is not clear at all how one could mend it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%