This paper communicates perspectives and ideas for lengthscale-transitions for metallic materials from nano over micro to macro. For micro-macro transitions, the FE 2 -method is described, where a top-down perspective manifests the need to introduce even finer-scaled information than typically considered on the microscale, such as e.g. atomistic details. In contrast, the description of the Quasi-Continuum method as an atomistic-continuum transition method naturally takes the perspective of a bottom-up approach, that starts at the nanoscale and aims at larger length scales by finite element techniques. We describe the main differences between the two multiscale frameworks referring to atomistics and those which pertain to continuum mechanics. Perspectives are proposed for combining and coupling the different frameworks in a consistent way. Finally we identify fields of applications, where nanoscale information is introduced to micro-models, either via sequential/hierarchical coupling or in concurrent frameworks. For the numerical simulation of materials, whose macroscopic material behavior is mainly governed by phenomena occurring at the microscale, computational homogenization has attracted interest in the past decade. Several approaches have been investigated to enable the computation of such materials. In this contribution we focus on first-order computational homogenization, see e.g.. A further development of the aforementioned technique is the second-order computational homogenization, see e.g. [4], which overcomes some of the drawbacks of the first-order one, e.g. taking into account the size of the underlying microstructure in a sense. Both techniques have in common, that they consider a microscopic boundary value problem at each integration point of the macroscopic boundary value problem. In the context of finite element discretizations on both scales this procedure is referred to as FE 2 .
First-order FE 2 approachThe FE 2 -method is based on the solution of microscopic boundary value problems attached to each macroscopic integration point. For the definition of the microscopic boundary value problems the choice of a suitable representative volume element (RVE) is necessary, which typically represents a sufficiently large microscopic substructure of the underlying material. The computational transition between the micro-and macroscale is done through volume averaging over the microscopic deformation gradient F and First Piola-Kirchhoff stresses P to compute their macroscopic counterparts F and P , see e.g. [3]. Reasonable microscopic boundary conditions are obtained from the macro-homogeneity condition, also referred to as Hillcondition, see [5]. Consequently, three possible types of microscopic boundary conditions are: (i) stress boundary condition, (ii) linear boundary displacements, and (iii) periodic boundary conditions. Additionally, the consistent macroscopic moduli are computed following [2, 3].
Construction of Statistically Similar Representative Volume Elements (SSRVEs)An essential task for dire...