2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psicod.2019.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aprendizaje musical y ansiedad escénica en edades tempranas: 8-12 años

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with what is reported in the scientific literature, girls in this study reported a significantly (and systematically) higher level of MPA than boys (Kenny & Osborne, 2006; Osborne & Kenny, 2005; Patston & Osborne, 2016; Urruzola & Bernaras, 2020). When analyzing items individually, seven items were found to have significantly higher means for girls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with what is reported in the scientific literature, girls in this study reported a significantly (and systematically) higher level of MPA than boys (Kenny & Osborne, 2006; Osborne & Kenny, 2005; Patston & Osborne, 2016; Urruzola & Bernaras, 2020). When analyzing items individually, seven items were found to have significantly higher means for girls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There is a significant body of literature that identifies MPA determinants as musicians' characteristics, performance context and, for younger musicians, parents. Gender has been identified by many researchers as playing a significant role; women and girls report experiencing more MPA than their masculine counterparts (Dempsey & Comeau, 2019; González et al, 2018; Papageorgi, 2020; Ryan, 2004; Urruzola & Bernaras, 2020). The growing body of literature on school‐aged musicians indicates that performing in solo and ensemble contexts is anxiety‐provoking for many, and that students as early as third grade in elementary school experience anxiety about performance (Braden et al, 2015; Casanova et al, 2018; MacAfee & Comeau, 2020; Osborne et al, 2007; Papageorgi, 2006; Ryan, 2004; Ryan & Andrews, 2009, 2021; Sârbescu & Dorgo, 2014).…”
Section: Mpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that none of the studies includes subjects under the age of 18, which is associated with a lack of early attention to this condition, which worsens over time. Studies on social anxiety and performance anxiety (of which MPA is a specific manifestation) reveal a bias in this age group linked to the absence of early monitoring, diagnosis, and intervention, as it is considered something common among musicians [ 33 , 65 ]. Thus, the perception of a lack of attention and intervention for MPA is greater in contexts where its presence is seen as insignificant and inherent to the profession and/or musical training [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking this into account and based on this review, it can be concluded that the treatment of this condition in students and professionals who already suffer from it remains an unresolved issue. This begins at early stages with a prompt detection of cases of debilitating forms of MPA, something that, as it has already been mentioned, is often neglected due to the belief that it is a normal part of the musician’s profession [ 33 , 65 ]. In addition to this initial assessment, it is necessary to implement a standardized evaluation of the degree of MPA and, based on this pattern, appropriate intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El instrumento más habitualmente empleado para la evaluación de la AIM es el Kenny Music Performance Anxiety -Revised (K-MPAI R) (Kenny, 2009), que reúne sus elementos en tres grandes grupos: Early relationship context (contexto de las relaciones tempranas), Psychological vulnerability (vulnerabilidad psicológica) y Proximal performance concerns (preocupaciones asociadas a actuaciones cercanas) (Kenny, 2009). Con respecto al estado de la cuestión en España en la última década encontramos que la mayoría de estudios versan sobre cómo afecta la AIM en un grupo de edad o nivel de estudios concreto (Urruzola y Bernaras, 2020;Zarza-Alzugaray, Orejudo, Casanova y Aparicio-Moreno, 2017;Zarza-Alzugaray, Casanova y Orejudo, 2016a); sobre cómo afecta la AIM a determinados grupos, como por ejemplo, al alumnado de flauta travesera de varios conservatorios profesionales de Andalucía (Herrera, Manjón y Quiles, 2015); y sobre la relación de la AIM con otros constructos y otras cuestiones asociadas (González, Blanco-Piñeiro y Díaz-Pereira, 2018;Orejudo, Zarza-Alzugaray y Casanova, 2018;Orejudo, Zarza-Alzugaray, Casanova, Rodríguez-Ledo y Mazas, 2017;Zarza-Alzugaray, F. J., Casanova, O., y Orejudo, S. 2016b;Zarza-Alzugaray, Casanova-López y Robles-Rubio, 2016). También se registra una revisión sistemática acerca de la epidemiología y los tratamientos de la AIM (Ortiz 2011a(Ortiz , 2011b) y la adaptación española del instrumento más relevante para medir la AIM (Zarza-Alzugaray, Orejudo, Casanova, y Mazas, 2015).…”
unclassified