2019
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aprepitant in Anti-histamine-refractory Chronic Nodular Prurigo: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over, Phase-II trial (APREPRU)

Abstract: Chronic nodular prurigo is characterized by multiple highly pruritic cutaneous nodules and a high impact on quality of life. The molecule substance P appears to play a significant role in the pathway of chronic pruritus. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial aimed to find out if using the drug aprepitant to block the substance P pathway could influence chronic pruritus in chronic nodular prurigo. However, the results showed no significant difference between aprepitant and placebo.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scratching is known to preserve prurigo nodules, and pruritus has to be greatly reduced in order enable prurigo lesions to heal. The modest antipruritic effect observed in the present investigation is in accordance with a recent multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study of aprepitant on chronic prurigo where both aprepitant‐ and placebo‐treated patients showed improvement, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups being shown …”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Scratching is known to preserve prurigo nodules, and pruritus has to be greatly reduced in order enable prurigo lesions to heal. The modest antipruritic effect observed in the present investigation is in accordance with a recent multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study of aprepitant on chronic prurigo where both aprepitant‐ and placebo‐treated patients showed improvement, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups being shown …”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…28,29 But, both, topical and systemic application, have been also reported to be insufficient for successful treatment in other studies. 19,[30][31][32] On the other hand, NK1R antagonism with serlopitant revealed high antipruritic effects in PN patients in a recent clinical trial 21. Within our study, we aimed to identify putative cutaneous effects of NK1R antagonists in PN patients and in vitro in a cell culture model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,16 Blocking the binding of SP by systemic application of the NK1R antagonist aprepitant showed a marked reduction of itch in large series of patients with chronic pruritus including PN, 17,18 but failed in a recent randomized placebocontrolled clinical trial. 19 However, another clinical trial with the novel NK1R antagonist serlopitant demonstrated high antipruritic effects in PN patients. 20,21 Up to now it is unclear if the antipruritic effects of NK1R antagonists result from receptor binding in the skin or the central nervous system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aprepitant was frequently supposed to mediate effects in the skin . But, both, topical and systemic application, have been also reported to be insufficient for successful treatment in other studies …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, NK1R may activate the MAP kinase signal pathway member ERK1/2, a known inducer of pro‐inflammatory ILs . Blocking the binding of SP by systemic application of the NK1R antagonist aprepitant showed a marked reduction of itch in large series of patients with chronic pruritus including PN, but failed in a recent randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial . However, another clinical trial with the novel NK1R antagonist serlopitant demonstrated high antipruritic effects in PN patients .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%