2007
DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.5.527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aprotinin—Are There Lessons Learned?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both centers maintain a prospectively collected observational database of all patients undergoing OLT. It is increasingly recognized that such observational datasets and analyses can play a substantial role in postmarket surveillance and safety evaluation of drugs when adequate statistical methods are used to control for any selection bias in the use of medication (41,42). The most robust statistical method currently available to control for selection bias with respect to the use of specific medication is considered to be propensity score adjusted analysis (43,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both centers maintain a prospectively collected observational database of all patients undergoing OLT. It is increasingly recognized that such observational datasets and analyses can play a substantial role in postmarket surveillance and safety evaluation of drugs when adequate statistical methods are used to control for any selection bias in the use of medication (41,42). The most robust statistical method currently available to control for selection bias with respect to the use of specific medication is considered to be propensity score adjusted analysis (43,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable criticism of the perceived imperfections of these two papers in relation to aspects of study design, statistical analysis, and the relative risk profile of the aprotinin-treated patients. 4 It is important to remember that aprotinin use in cardiac surgery was initially directed toward patients considered to be at substantial risk of excessive bleeding. Furthermore, the Hammersmith regimen represented the recommended and approved dose in the early UK studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent editorial 33 praised the method used in the analysis of the large numbers of patients receiving aprotinin for rare side effects 4 that led the FDA to issue its warning regarding the use of aprotinin. 18 In fact, the author of that editorial suggested that the large review should be a model for future studies of drug safety and cited the admonition to ‘first, do no harm’ as the overriding consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%