APSA Members experience bias and discrimination in training and practice

Vernamonti, Jack; Bowen-Jallow, Kanika A.; Paredes, Anghela Z.; Cockrell, Hannah; Morrison, Zachary; Huerta, Carlos Theodore; Garcia, Alejandro V.; Meckmongkol, Teerin T.; Oyetunji, Tolulope A.; Ramos-Irizarry, Carmen T.; Diaz-Miron, Jose; Siddiqui, Sabina; Zamora, Irving; Stallion, Anthony; Martin, Katherine L.; Reyes, Cynthia; Newman, Erika A.

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.09.038

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…None of the abstracts mentioned disabled people. Six abstracts made the connection to discrimination against marginalized groups, mentioning the terms "women", "Indigenous women", "women of colour", "race", "gender", "non-binary", "LGBTQ", "URM person, of color", and burnout, and indicated that DEI actions are needed or were taken [169,[229][230][231][232][233]. One argued that DEI decreases burnout [234] and one argued that the purpose of DEI is to decrease burnout [235].…”

Section: Edi and Burnoutmentioning

confidence: 99%

Burnout through the Lenses of Equity/Equality, Diversity and Inclusion and Disabled People: A Scoping Review

Wolbring

Lillywhite

2023

Societies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Burnout is a problem within the workplace including in higher education, the activity of activism, and in reaction to experiencing systemic discrimination in daily life. Disabled people face problems in all of these areas and therefore are in danger of experiencing “disability burnout”/”disablism burnout”. Equity/equality, diversity, and inclusion” (EDI) linked actions are employed to improve the workplace, especially for marginalized groups including disabled people. How burnout is discussed and what burnout data is generated in the academic literature in relation to EDI and disabled people influences burnout policies, education, and research related to EDI and to disabled people. Therefore, we performed a scoping review study of academic abstracts employing SCOPUS, the 70 databases of EBSCO-HOST and Web of Science with the aim to obtain a better understanding of the academic coverage of burnout concerning disabled people and EDI. We found only 14 relevant abstracts when searching for 12 EDI phrases and five EDI policy frameworks. Within the 764 abstracts covering burnout and different disability terms, a biased coverage around disabled people was evident with disabled people being mostly mentioned as the cause of burnout experienced by others. Only 30 abstracts covered the burnout of disabled people, with eight using the term “autistic burnout”. Disabled activists’ burnout was not covered. No abstract contained the phrase “disability burnout”, but seven relevant hits were obtained using full-text searches of Google Scholar. Our findings suggest that important data is missing to guide evidence-based decision making around burnout and EDI and burnout of disabled people.

show abstract