“…A large proportion of aptasensors that were described in 2018 and 2019 were for general cancer biomarkers, meaning they were biomarkers that were useful for multiple cancer types. Biomarkers that were examined include PDGF-BB (LODs, 0.13 nM, 0.08 ng/mL, 0.52 nM, and 3.2 pM), − VEGF (LODs, 0.3 fM and 12 pM), − CD70 (LOD, 14 cells/mL), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), nucleolin, ,,, ATP (LOD, 0.01 pM), , epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, LODs, 5.64 fg/mL, 0.7 ng/mL, and 0.1 ng/mL), − MCF-7 cells (LOD, 61 cells/mL), telomerase (LOD, 100 cells), thymidine kinase 1 (LOD, 54 pg/mL), miRNA let-7a (LOD, 5.12 aM), cytochrome C (LOD, 25.90 nM), lysozyme (LOD, 0.94 nM), mucin 1 (LOD, 0.13 ng/mL), , epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM, LODs, 10 pM and 20 pg/mL), , N -glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc, LOD, 10 ng/mL), and CD63 exosome surface protein (LODs, 32 exosomes/μL, 73 exosomes/μL, 203 exosomes/μL). − The usefulness of many of these biosensors was evaluated in complex matrices, such as whole blood, serum, or cell lysate, or in the presence of whole cells. The strength of each of these biosensors is their diverse application to multiple cancers.…”