“…aureus. Conventional culture methods, although considered to be gold standards for the detection of bacteria, are reliable and accurate, but they are considerably time-consuming (typically 2–3 days). − More recent approaches involve nucleic acid amplification techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for rapid detection of this bacteria. , Although simple to use and widely available, the amplification step can also amplify false targets, and thus, the PCR-based techniques are not free from false positives. , The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the antigen and antibody interaction is another commonly used method for the detection of bacterial foodborne pathogens due to their high specificity. , However, antibodies are relatively more expensive and have shorter shelf lives than aptamers. , More recently, techniques such as colorimetric, , surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), , and electrochemical methods , have been developed as novel strategies for the detection of S. aureus but they are also not free from limitations.…”