2019
DOI: 10.24215/24517836e015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apuntes sociolingüisticos sobre el lenguaje inclusivo

Abstract: Este artículo está estructurado en dos partes. En la primera, se plantea una aproximación sociolingüística al fenómeno denominado “lenguaje inclusivo”. Allí se reflexiona acerca de la utilidad de la variante con e y se proponen cuatro criterios para el análisis (umbral, economía, habitus lingüístico y estrategia). En la segunda, se exponen criterios gramaticales que pueden ser útiles para una eventual estandarización de esta variante del español.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This task, in that sense, supposes a voluntary decision task, on which a number of beliefs operate. Not only gender representations and stereotypes, but also linguistic ideologies and dominant discursive matrices, which in turn construct frameworks of dominant common sense (MORENO CABRERA, 2008;MORAGAS, 2020;SAYAGO, 2019). This is how an acceptability judgment task involves not only processes and mental representations in an implicit way, but also involves many of these factors, in addition to the linguistic norms and prescriptions imposed by formal institutions, beyond the usual linguistic uses and speakers' daily lives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task, in that sense, supposes a voluntary decision task, on which a number of beliefs operate. Not only gender representations and stereotypes, but also linguistic ideologies and dominant discursive matrices, which in turn construct frameworks of dominant common sense (MORENO CABRERA, 2008;MORAGAS, 2020;SAYAGO, 2019). This is how an acceptability judgment task involves not only processes and mental representations in an implicit way, but also involves many of these factors, in addition to the linguistic norms and prescriptions imposed by formal institutions, beyond the usual linguistic uses and speakers' daily lives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No se trata de una batalla cultural por las palabras o su simbología, el uso eufemístico gramatical inclusivo absorbe en su terminología una ficción de neo resistencia al estándar genérico lingüístico; es decir, sin caer en determinismos lingüísticos de cuestión umbral (Sayago, 2019). La persona como ser humano racional sin distinción de ser otro ser con el cambio de una palabra con una desinstitucionalización de la lengua.…”
Section: El Hombre: Aseveraciones Desde La Constitución Semántica Inc...unclassified
“…Many universities and public offices have developed guidelines for non-sexist and inclusive language, and scholarship in general has shown a favorable attitude toward the acceptance of nonbinary forms, either standard (i.e. using epicene nouns) or nonstandard (-x or -e) (Romero and Funes, 2018;Kalinowski, 2019;Martínez, 2019;Sayago, 2019;Tosi, 2019;Kalinowski, 2020b). As the issue has only gained visibility in the last three years, research on the subject is still scarce and mainly theoretical (Bolívar, 2019;Gasparri, 2020;Glozman, 2020;Kalinowski, 2020b), analysis of discourses which topicalize inclusive language (Barrera Linares, 2019; Pérez and Moragas, 2020) and discursive practices in secondary education (Castillo Sánchez and Mayo, 2019;Tosi, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%