2001
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0672:afbrtt]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic Food Base Response to the 1996 Test Flood Below Glen Canyon Dam, Colorado River, Arizona

Abstract: We examined the impact of the 1996 test flood released from Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) on the aquatic food base in the Colorado River through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Benthic scour and entrainment of both primary and secondary producers occurred at all study sites along the 385-km river corridor. The majority of the organic drift occurred within the first 48 h of the test flood with the arrival of the hydrostatic wave. Recent macrophyte colonizers (Chara, Potamogeton, and Elodea) of fine sediment i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
38
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also show that high flow events can remove these populations, leaving the unimpounded reaches of the river devoid of appropriate spawning habitat for periods of at least 1 year. This scouring of macrophyte populations has been reported in other studies (Brierley et al, 1989;Shannon et al, 2001;Schaller et al, 2004) and populations may take years to return to their original levels. This loss of macrophytes has important ramifications on other components of the ecosystem, since they provide habitat for zooplankton and fish (Irvine et al, 1989;Basu et al, 2000), they filter nutrients and stabilize sediments (Kemp et al, 1984) and affect phytoplankton and filamentous algal populations (Wigand et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Results also show that high flow events can remove these populations, leaving the unimpounded reaches of the river devoid of appropriate spawning habitat for periods of at least 1 year. This scouring of macrophyte populations has been reported in other studies (Brierley et al, 1989;Shannon et al, 2001;Schaller et al, 2004) and populations may take years to return to their original levels. This loss of macrophytes has important ramifications on other components of the ecosystem, since they provide habitat for zooplankton and fish (Irvine et al, 1989;Basu et al, 2000), they filter nutrients and stabilize sediments (Kemp et al, 1984) and affect phytoplankton and filamentous algal populations (Wigand et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…If control points are upstream of losing river reaches, downstream flows are likely to fall below the acceptable level. Comparable problems due to longitudinal variation apply to 'channel maintenance flows', 'flushing flows', 'flow pulses' or any other hydrological index or flow regime component that is considered ecologically valuable (Tockner et al, 2000;Shannon et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also was a major decrease in periphyton AFDM at the Upper site after the June flood, although no effect was seen in periphyton chlorophyll concentrations. Others have noted that flood frequency is related negatively to periphyton chlorophyll abundance (Biggs, 1995), although this relationship occurs only if the algae are scoured (Shannon et al, 2001). Aquat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sediment supply and mobility may increase downstream as contributions from sideslopes and tributaries increase. Near the dam, disturbance may simply be from sheer stress associated with higher flows, whereas the effects of sediment scouring probably increases further downstream (Shannon et al, 2001). For instance, the first lateral debris flow into the Spöl River occurs around 250 m below the dam, thus disturbance by sediment scouring is probably minimal upstream of this debris flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation