2017
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.152108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic insects in a multistress environment: cross-tolerance to salinity and desiccation

Abstract: Exposing organisms to a particular stressor may enhance tolerance to a subsequent stress, when protective mechanisms against the two stressors are shared. Such cross-tolerance is a common adaptive response in dynamic multivariate environments and often indicates potential co-evolution of stress traits. Many aquatic insects in inland saline waters from Mediterranean-climate regions are sequentially challenged with salinity and desiccation stress. Thus, cross-tolerance to these physiologically similar stressors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high percentage of long-chain hydrocarbons has been shown to confer impermeability to the cuticle in other arthropods (e.g., Hadley, 1977; Toolson & Hadley, 1977; Lockey, 1980; Gibbs & Pomonis, 1995; Gibbs, Fukuzato & Matzkin, 2003; Gibbs & Rajpurohit, 2010). The contribution of CHCs in driving differences in stress tolerance between aquatic beetles needs to be further investigated, but the differences in cuticle permeability between the two species inferred from our results are consistent with the higher desiccation resistance (Pallarés et al, 2017), osmoregulatory ability and salinity tolerance (Pallarés et al, 2015) of E. jesusarribasi compared to N. baeticus. Specifically, the average water loss rates under desiccation conditions (40% RH) was 4.04% of fresh mass h −1 in N. baeticus and 1.58% of fresh mass h −1 in E. jesusarribasi (Pallarés et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A high percentage of long-chain hydrocarbons has been shown to confer impermeability to the cuticle in other arthropods (e.g., Hadley, 1977; Toolson & Hadley, 1977; Lockey, 1980; Gibbs & Pomonis, 1995; Gibbs, Fukuzato & Matzkin, 2003; Gibbs & Rajpurohit, 2010). The contribution of CHCs in driving differences in stress tolerance between aquatic beetles needs to be further investigated, but the differences in cuticle permeability between the two species inferred from our results are consistent with the higher desiccation resistance (Pallarés et al, 2017), osmoregulatory ability and salinity tolerance (Pallarés et al, 2015) of E. jesusarribasi compared to N. baeticus. Specifically, the average water loss rates under desiccation conditions (40% RH) was 4.04% of fresh mass h −1 in N. baeticus and 1.58% of fresh mass h −1 in E. jesusarribasi (Pallarés et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed beetles needs to be further investigated, but the differences in cuticle permeability between the two species inferred from our results are consistent with the higher desiccation resistance (Pallarés et al, 2017), osmoregulatory ability and salinity tolerance (Pallarés et al, 2015) of E. jesusarribasi compared to N. baeticus. Specifically, the average water loss rates under desiccation conditions (40% RH) was 4.04% of fresh mass h -1 in N. baeticus and 1.58% of fresh mass h -1 in E.jesusarribasi (Pallarés et al, 2017).…”
Section: Interspecific Variation In Chcssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In any case, it must be noted that we have data only on the ecological preferences of the species of Hygrotini, not on their physiological tolerances. If tolerance to salinity is an exaptation derived from a plesiomorphic adaptation to terrestrial environments (as hypothesised by Arribas et al., ; see Pallarés, Botella‐Cruz, Arribas, Millán, & Velasco, for an experimental confirmation of the link between salinity and desiccation tolerance), tolerance to at least certain degree of salinity may be widespread even in species commonly found in FW habitats, as has been demonstrated to be the case in other groups of aquatic Coleoptera (Céspedes et al., ; Pallarés et al., ). Our ecological typification was also in most cases based on qualitative descriptions, without quantitative data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%