2000
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-57-10-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic macrophyte richness in Danish lakes in relation to alkalinity, transparency, and lake area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
91
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientists have found that in terrestrial systems, plant richness varies positively with plant abundance (for example, Loreau et al 2001;Rajaniemi 2003) or quadratically (rising then falling) as biomass increases (Chalcraft et al 2004). In a study of 73 Danish lakes, SAV richness was found to vary positively with size of colonized areas (Vestergaard and Sand-Jensen 2002). However, we found no relationship between richness and SAV biomass.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Scientists have found that in terrestrial systems, plant richness varies positively with plant abundance (for example, Loreau et al 2001;Rajaniemi 2003) or quadratically (rising then falling) as biomass increases (Chalcraft et al 2004). In a study of 73 Danish lakes, SAV richness was found to vary positively with size of colonized areas (Vestergaard and Sand-Jensen 2002). However, we found no relationship between richness and SAV biomass.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Trophic status and the size of a reservoir are important factors that determine its richness and diversity (Murphy et al, 1990;Rørslett, 1991;Vestergaard & Sand-Jensen, 2000;Bornette et al, 2001;Lougheed et al, 2001). The present analysis focuses mainly on the role of the macrophytes commonly growing in water reservoirs and their importance for estimating richness and diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several abiotic and biotic factors determine the aquatic macrophyte richness of lakes. The former group of factors includes, among others, latitude (Heino & Toivonen, 2008), water chemistry and the trophic state (Murphy et al, 1990;Rørslett, 1991;Vestergaard & Sand-Jensen, 2000;Bornette et al, 2001), water level fluctuation (Van Geest et al, 2005;Holm & Clausen, 2006;Maltchik et al, 2007) and the lake area and morphometry (Rørslett, 1991;Gasith & Hoyer, 1998;Vestergaard & Sand-Jensen, 2000;Murphy, 2002;Thomaz et al, 2003). Among the biotic factors, significant effect on the richness of plant species is exerted by dominant freshwater aquatic and wetland plant species (Gopal & Goel, 1993;Gough et al, 1994;Grace & Wetzel, 1998;Ervin & Wetzel, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we were not able to employ any statistical analysis to compare both species in view of the differences in the experiments duration (see reasons in Methods), these results indicate that E. najas would be a more successful species in habitats with low alkalinity, at E. najas and E. densa) increase the photosynthetic rates with increasing alkalinity. Thus, differently from free-floating and emergent species, which depend more on phosphorus and nitrogen for growth (Henry-Silva et al, 2008), alkalinity has been considered as an important variable explaining patterns of occurrence of submersed species (Vestergaard and Sand-Jensen, 2000). These results may be partially explained by the ability these plants have to assimilate bicarbonate, which represents an alternative source of inorganic carbon (Sand-Jansen and Gordon, 1986).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%