2011
DOI: 10.2172/1023838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic Natural Areas Analysis and Evaluation: Oak Ridge Reservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, substantial efforts have been made on inventory and understanding the connectivity of surface and subterranean aquatic features (Figure 2). Thus, we first reviewed previous aquatic resource delineation efforts and reports to determine locations of known streams, wetlands, and seeps within the VTR construction area (e.g., Rosensteel, 1996;Baranski 2011Baranski , 2018. We then used these data alongside new quantitative hydrology models to focus current fieldbased mapping.…”
Section: Aquatic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, substantial efforts have been made on inventory and understanding the connectivity of surface and subterranean aquatic features (Figure 2). Thus, we first reviewed previous aquatic resource delineation efforts and reports to determine locations of known streams, wetlands, and seeps within the VTR construction area (e.g., Rosensteel, 1996;Baranski 2011Baranski , 2018. We then used these data alongside new quantitative hydrology models to focus current fieldbased mapping.…”
Section: Aquatic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused on the topographic/habitat extremes because the preliminary review indicated that potential sensitive flora and fauna within the review area were associated either with aquatic or ridgetop features or were more easily detected via alternative methods (Figure 3). VES transects were generated in ArcMap 10.7 (ESRI, 2018) based on previous habitat and aquatic resource mapping efforts (Rosensteel 1996;Baranski 2009Baranski , 2011Baranski , 2018. Transects and search methods were prioritized according to their level of connectivity (e.g., hydrologic or contiguous natural area) to areas with known records of rare and sensitive wildlife outside of the VTR construction area (Wade and Carter 2020;Wade, DeRolph, and Carter, in preparation).…”
Section: Wildlife Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, substantial prior effort was placed on inventory and understanding the connectivity of surface and subterranean aquatic features. Thus, we first reviewed previous aquatic resource delineation efforts and reports to determine locations of known streams, wetlands, and seeps within the SSP-2A parcel (e.g., Rosensteel 1996;Baranski 2009Baranski , 2011Baranski , 2018. We then used these data alongside new quantitative hydrology models to focus current field-based mapping.…”
Section: Aquatic Resources Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movement of water was modeled as a function of elevation and known karst features (sinks, springs, macropores, and outcrops). Model was initially trained on known aquatic features (e.g., Rosensteel 1996;Baranski 2009Baranski , 2011Baranski , 2018 and continually retrained using aquatic and karst features as they were mapped. Teal regions indicate WWCs and/or expected routes of subsurface flow.…”
Section: Aquatic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation