2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202270274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic Skin Enabled by Multi‐Modality Iontronic Sensing (Adv. Funct. Mater. 48/2022)

Abstract: Aquatic Skin Enabled by Multi‐Modality Iontronic Sensing Perception of multi‐modality information is of critical importance for aquatic activities; however, the complex underwater situation limits the development of sensing technology in such environment. In article number 2205947, Tingrui Pan, Yu Chang, and co‐workers developed an underwater environment‐incorporated iontronic sensing strategy, referred to as aquatic skin, with multi‐modality sensing capacities of contact pressure, tactile mapping, depth, temp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison between our proposed e‐skin and the recently reported capacitive e‐skin provided in Figure 2l demonstrates excellent performance in terms of sensitivity and LOD performance. [ 38–48 ] Table S1 (Supporting Information) presents more detailed performance comparisons, including sensitivity, response/recovery time, LOD, and compression stability. Response and recovery times are other essential parameters of the e‐skin, and have been extensively used to evaluate its dynamic response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between our proposed e‐skin and the recently reported capacitive e‐skin provided in Figure 2l demonstrates excellent performance in terms of sensitivity and LOD performance. [ 38–48 ] Table S1 (Supporting Information) presents more detailed performance comparisons, including sensitivity, response/recovery time, LOD, and compression stability. Response and recovery times are other essential parameters of the e‐skin, and have been extensively used to evaluate its dynamic response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47,48] The charge separation is much smaller than that of conventional capacitive sensors (mostly 10-200 μm), thus signal enhancement of several orders of magnitude can be obtained. [49,50] This type of device generally exhibits ultrahigh unit area capacitance immediately, which is on the order of several μF cm −2 in a sub-MHz spectrum, more than 1000 times greater than that of the conventional parallel-plate capacitive sensors, ranging from tens to hundreds of pF cm −2 . Figure S6, Supporting Information, shows the responses of the conventional and iontronic capacitive devices when the external objects continuously approach and move.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pressure Sensing and Electrochromic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, Pan et al. [ 39 ] reported a packaging‐free aquatic electronic skin using iontronic sensing principle, the aquatic skin can be directly performed in an underwater environment with inherent hydraulic balance, thereby offering a reliable solution to mitigate the influences of hydraulic pressure. Therefore, the preparation of waterproof nanocomposites that incorporate conductive nanofillers into the PDMS substrate, along with the packaging‐free sensor structural design can serve as a highly effective strategy for achieving underwater force sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%