2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1157-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic Toxicology of Perfluorinated Chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
157
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
157
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The aquatic toxicology of PFAAs had been investigated by previous studies involving drinking water and aquatic organisms (Giesy et al, 2010;Zushi et al, 2012). Lin et al (2010) assessed the environmental risk of PFOA and PFOS in Nanmen River water and indicated that PFOS concentrations up to 6.05 μg/L posed great risk to local ecosystem.…”
Section: Preliminary Environmental Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aquatic toxicology of PFAAs had been investigated by previous studies involving drinking water and aquatic organisms (Giesy et al, 2010;Zushi et al, 2012). Lin et al (2010) assessed the environmental risk of PFOA and PFOS in Nanmen River water and indicated that PFOS concentrations up to 6.05 μg/L posed great risk to local ecosystem.…”
Section: Preliminary Environmental Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generally slow movement of groundwater makes this environment more of a sink, while contamination of surface water can lead to widespread dissemination (Lin et al, 2015). High concentrations of PFAAs in surface and ground water could pose not only a potential health risk via consumption of drinking water but also a risk to wildlife in aquatic ecosystems (Mak et al, 2009;Giesy et al, 2010). PFAAs are not readily removed by conventional drinking-water treatment processes (Eschauzier et al, 2012;Xiao et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the environmental risks of PFOS in this region were assessed by comparing the modeled concentrations with environmental quality criteria or standard values. Since official environmental quality criteria or standard values for PFOS are not available in China yet, several water quality regulatory guideline values, which are officially issued in foreign countries or proposed in research papers (EU, 2011;Giesy et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2014), were used for comparison in this study. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) divides water quality criteria values into criteria maximum concentrations (CMC) and criteria continuous concentrations (CCC), which are defined as the highest concentration of PFOS in surface water used to protect aquatic life from acute and chronic effects.…”
Section: Environmental Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) divides water quality criteria values into criteria maximum concentrations (CMC) and criteria continuous concentrations (CCC), which are defined as the highest concentration of PFOS in surface water used to protect aquatic life from acute and chronic effects. The CMC (21 μg/L), CCC (5.1 μg/L) and Avian Wildlife Value (AWV = 47 ng/L) for PFOS were first calculated by Giesy et al (2010). A much tougher concentration limit for PFOS in surface water was set in the European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive (WFD) Environmental Quality Standards (EQS), which was 0.65 ng/L for annual averaged value (EU, 2011).…”
Section: Environmental Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation