2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aqueous piperazine derivatives for CO2 capture: Accurate screening by a wetted wall column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is said that typical power plant designs with MEA will reduce power plant output by 25-35 % (Chen and Rochelle 2011). Because most of the energy is used in the stripper, it is important to reduce the required amount for this piece of equipment.…”
Section: Process Energy Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is said that typical power plant designs with MEA will reduce power plant output by 25-35 % (Chen and Rochelle 2011). Because most of the energy is used in the stripper, it is important to reduce the required amount for this piece of equipment.…”
Section: Process Energy Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this temperature range, the rate for the blend stays relatively constant, approximately equal to that for 8 m PZ and over 2.5 times faster than 7 m MEA. Temperature above 60°C leads to a decrease in the mass transfer rate of the blend, as has been observed for other amine systems [24][25][26]. The blend performed as well as concentrated PZ and represents another solvent that can outperform the baseline MEA solvent.…”
Section: Co 2 Absorption Ratementioning
confidence: 61%
“…The blend and 8 m PZ have approximately double the CO 2 capacity as MEA, an important advantage. The average k' g , k' g avg , based on a log-mean flux and log-mean driving force across a typical absorber design, as described in detail previously, is compared at 40°C [26]. Both PZ and the blend have k g ' avg values double that of MEA.…”
Section: Overall Comparison Of Blendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, alternative aqueous amine solutions, which could be composed by several amines dissolved in water, have to be tested and compared in order to identify the best ones, which combine a fast reaction rate with the CO 2 , a high absorption capacity, a high stability and a low energetic regeneration cost. Recent experimental works (Chen and Rochelle, 2011;Cullinane and Rochelle, 2006;Khalili et al, 2009) have shown that aqueous solution of piperazine derivatives are very promising to replace the aqueous solutions of MEA in CO 2 capture processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%