Arabic intensive care delirium screening checklist's validity and reliability: A multicenter study

Al-Qadheeb, Nada S.; Nazer, Lama; Aisa, Tharwat; Osman, Hassan O.; Rugaan, Asia; Alzahrani, Ahmad; Ghonimat, Iyad; Mohammed, Alaaldin M.; Maghrabi, Khalid; Alrowaished, Abdulellah A.; Hussein, Najah; Maslamani, Yahya; Falatah, Sawsan; Skrobik, Yoanna

doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.08.025

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a Turkish study (Kose et al, 2016), Cronbach's α ranged from 0.720 to 0.850. An acceptable value (0.63) was reported for an Arabic version (Al-Qadheeb et al, 2019). A Belgian study showed a value of 0.839.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Comparing the CAM-ICU and ICDSC for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients

Locihová¹,

Axmann²

2022

Cent Eur J Nurs Midw

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The study compared two instruments for detecting delirium, the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) as a reference method. Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: The study included 126 consecutive patients staying in the intensive care unit (ICU) for more than 24 hours. The diagnostic properties of both questionnaires and agreement between them were studied and compared. Additionally, the two tests were used to assess the relationship between selected patient parameters and the presence of delirium. Results: There was a high level of agreement between the CAM-ICU and ICDSC, as expressed by Cohen's κ of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.821-0.838). Cronbach's α assessing the internal consistency of a Czech version of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC was 0.903 and 0.865, respectively. The CAM-ICU had 85.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 84.6-91.8) and 94.1% specificity (95% CI: 92.4-95.5); the ICDSC (cut-off ≥ 4) had 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.0-93.5) and 89.0% specificity (95% CI: 86.8-91.0). Conclusion: Both compared diagnostic instruments, the CAM-ICU and ICDSC, appear to be adequate and usable. When compared with the CAM-ICU as a reference method, the ICDSC showed similar results and a good level of agreement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Comparing the CAM-ICU and ICDSC for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients

Locihová¹,

Axmann²

2022

Cent Eur J Nurs Midw

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Prediction of Loan Pricing on the basis of Area Location using K-Nearest Neighbour and Support Vector Machine Learning Algorithms

Kumar

2023

2023 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks and Application (ICSCNA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sedation and Non-Invasive Mask Ventilation in Patients with Delirium and Acute Respiratory Failure

Левиков

Марченков

Стрижков

et al. 2020

Obŝaâ reanimatologiâ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine and haloperidol in patients with delirium and acute respiratory failure in non-invasive mask lung ventilation.Materials and methods. We carried out a retrospective analysis of data on patients with somatogenic delirium and acute respiratory failure (57 men, 4 women) experienced noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in the intensive care unit of the Botkin State Clinical Hospital in 2017–2018. Depending on the type of sedation the patients were divided into two groups: those on dexmedetomidine (n=31) and those receiving haloperidol (n=30). Dexmedetomidine was administered as a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.2–1.4 µg/kg/h while controlling the level of consciousness; haloperidol was administered by intravenous bolus injections until a sufficient level of sedation was reached in a dose of 2.5 mg 2–3 times a day.Results. The efficiency of sedation to achieve the required level of cooperation and possibility of NIV was 87.1% (27 patients) and 66.6% (20 patients) in dexmedetomidine and haloperidol groups. When estimating sedation in patients of both groups according to the RASS scale the scores did not differ significantly and were equal on the average to 1.7±0.3 (eye contact to voice). In haloperidol group in 10 out of 30 (33.3%) patients a sufficient level of sedation was not achieved, which required immediate tracheal intubation and invasive lung ventilation. Mortality in this group was 20% (6 patients), while in dexmedetomidine group it was 6.4% (2 patients).Conclusion. The use of dexmedetomidine, despite greater variability of hemodynamic parameters, allows to perform NIV with sufficient cooperation with the patient, reduces the frequency of tracheal intubation, risk of complications and mortality.

show abstract

Arabic intensive care delirium screening checklist's validity and reliability: A multicenter study

Cited by 5 publications

References 46 publications

Comparing the CAM-ICU and ICDSC for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients

Comparing the CAM-ICU and ICDSC for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients

Prediction of Loan Pricing on the basis of Area Location using K-Nearest Neighbour and Support Vector Machine Learning Algorithms

Sedation and Non-Invasive Mask Ventilation in Patients with Delirium and Acute Respiratory Failure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About