2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cist.2016.7805072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arabic text classification methods: Systematic literature review of primary studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that SVM outperformed the other classifiers for the genre identification task in classical Arabic texts with a general accuracy of 80% and a highest accuracy of 86%. This result supports the results in the Arabic text classification literature, which indicates that SVM outperforms other supervised classification algorithms [Alabbas, Al-Khateeb, Mansour et al (2016)]. The study also aimed to identify, for the best performing classifier, the SVM classifier, the optimal value of MFW for the task of genre identification for classical Arabic text.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that SVM outperformed the other classifiers for the genre identification task in classical Arabic texts with a general accuracy of 80% and a highest accuracy of 86%. This result supports the results in the Arabic text classification literature, which indicates that SVM outperforms other supervised classification algorithms [Alabbas, Al-Khateeb, Mansour et al (2016)]. The study also aimed to identify, for the best performing classifier, the SVM classifier, the optimal value of MFW for the task of genre identification for classical Arabic text.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…An accuracy of 86% is considered acceptable for the genre detection task, as the results reported in the literature are 69% for SVM on German novels using stylometric features of text [Hettinger, Becker, Reger et al (2015)], and 64% for SVM on genre identification for English using the the Brown Corpus [Wu, Markert and Sharoff (2010)]. For Arabic genre identification, there are no previous studies to compare to, however, comparing to Arabic text classification literature our results are also reasonable, as the accuracy of Arabic text classification ranges between 61% and 98% [Alabbas, Al-Khateeb, Mansour et al (2016)]. Comparing our results to attribution studies, our results are comparable to those reported in the literature, Howedi et al [Howedi and Mohd (2014)] report 76.67% accuracy for SVM, and [Ouamour and Sayoud (2012); Ouamour and Sayoud (2013)] indicate performance of 80% by an SVM variant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Arabic texts, text preprocessing usually involves the following: removing punctuation marks, diacritics and non-Arabic letters, excluding the words with length less than three, and eliminating stop-words [15]. Arabic TREC-2002 Light Stemmer [16] have been employed to return the words to their stems by removing the most frequent suffixes and prefixes.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History of Malware evolution shows that many malicious software were written for fun or testing software behaviour. However, state-ofthe-art malware is also developed for financial gain (Alam et al, 2014c), political influence, enabling anti-social behaviour such as cyberstalking (al-Khateeb et al, 2016), or to sabotaging the defence systems of a country. Consequently, malware coding became extremely sophisticated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%