“…It is extraordinarily signifi cant that the oldest identifi able angiosperm fossils correspond to the earliest diverging branches in molecular phylogenies (Doyle, 2012), specifi cally, Nymphaeales (Monetianthus mirus; Friis et al, 2001Friis et al, , 2009); Austrobaileyales (Anacostia spp. ; Friis et al, 1997a); Chloranthales (the Asteropollis plant; Friis et al, 1994aFriis et al, , 1997bFriis et al, , 1999; the earliest diverging branches within Magnoliidae, namely Calycanthaceae and Lauraceae within Laurales (Virginianthus calycanthoides; Friis et al, 1994b andPotomacanthus lobatus, Crane et al, 1994;von Balthazar et al, 2007, respectively), Magnoliaceae within Magnoliales (Endressinia brasiliana; Mohr and Bernardes-de-Oliveira, 2004), and Winteraceae within Canellales (Walkeripollis; Doyle et al, 1990a, b); Monocotyledoneae, namely Araceae within Alismatales (Mayoa portugallica; Friis et al, 2004); and Eudicotlyledoneae, namely Ranunculales (Teixeiraea lusitanica;von Balthazar, 2005) and Nelumbonaceae and Platanaceae within Proteales (the Nelumbites plant; Upchurch et al, 1994, and the Sapindopsis plant; Crane et al, 1993, respectively). Each of these three lines of evidence is substantial in itself, and together, they constitute a formidable objection to the possibility of an extensive missing history in the early fossil record of angiosperms.…”