Abstract. In this paper we propose a generalization of the recent work by Gatheral and Jacquier [J. Gatheral and A. Jacquier, Quant. Finance, 14 (2014) 1. Introduction. European option prices are usually quoted in terms of the corresponding implied volatility, and over the last decade a large number of papers (both from practitioners and academics) has focused on understanding its behavior and characteristics. The most important directions have been toward (i) understanding the behavior of the implied volatility in a given model [1, 2, 7, 12] and (ii) deciphering its behavior in a model-independent way, as in [17,21,20]. These results have provided us with a set of tools and methods to check whether a given parameterization is free of arbitrage or not. In particular, given a set of observed data (say, European Calls and Puts for different strikes and maturities), it is of fundamental importance to determine a methodology ensuring that both interpolation and extrapolation of this data are also arbitrage-free. Such approaches have been carried out, for instance, in [4,6,22]. Several parameterizations of the implied volatility surface have now become popular, in particular [8,13,15], albeit not ensuring absence of arbitrage.Recently, Gatheral and Jacquier [10] proposed a new class of implied volatility parameterization, based on the previous works by Gatheral [8]. In particular, they provide explicit sufficient and-in a certain sense-almost necessary conditions ensuring that such a surface is free of arbitrage. We shall recall the exact definition of arbitrage and see that it can be decomposed into two elements: butterfly arbitrage and calendar spread arbitrage. This new class depends on the maturity and can hence be used to model the whole volatility surface,