2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrage opportunities in publication and ghost authors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaboration has become valued for its own sake and there is evidence that collaboration also impacts traditional bibliometric variables, e.g., there is evidence that coauthored papers receive more citations (Onodera and Yoshikane, 2015). However, co-author weighting may have consequences such as offering arbitrage opportunities for adding authors, e.g., ghost authors (Smolinsky, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collaboration has become valued for its own sake and there is evidence that collaboration also impacts traditional bibliometric variables, e.g., there is evidence that coauthored papers receive more citations (Onodera and Yoshikane, 2015). However, co-author weighting may have consequences such as offering arbitrage opportunities for adding authors, e.g., ghost authors (Smolinsky, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, co-author weighting may have consequences such as offering arbitrage opportunities for adding authors, e.g. ghost authors (Smolinsky, 2020).…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 99%