2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-020-00931-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots and soil respond differently to biotic and abiotic factors in the Serengeti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also evidence that the AMF communities differ between the host roots and the rhizosphere soil (Hempel et al, 2007;Li et al, 2018;Sepp et al, 2019). It has been suggested that the AMF community structure of these two mediums is driven by a number of different factors, with the AMF community composition colonizing the roots mainly determined by the host plant, while the AMF assemblage of the rhizosphere soil is more related to environmental conditions including soil properties (Li et al, 2018;Stevens et al, 2020). However, most studies have investigated AMF assemblages in either root (Vályi et al, 2015) or soil (van der Heyde et al, 2017a), and few have assessed both simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence that the AMF communities differ between the host roots and the rhizosphere soil (Hempel et al, 2007;Li et al, 2018;Sepp et al, 2019). It has been suggested that the AMF community structure of these two mediums is driven by a number of different factors, with the AMF community composition colonizing the roots mainly determined by the host plant, while the AMF assemblage of the rhizosphere soil is more related to environmental conditions including soil properties (Li et al, 2018;Stevens et al, 2020). However, most studies have investigated AMF assemblages in either root (Vályi et al, 2015) or soil (van der Heyde et al, 2017a), and few have assessed both simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study found that AM fungal structures in roots and soil have different responses to biotic and abiotic factors. The AM fungal community structure in roots is mainly affected by host plants and disturbances (grazing), while AM fungi in soil are greatly affected by environmental factors [18]. AM fungi can form a huge mycorrhizal network and connect individual plants within the community, which facilitates the transport of nutrient resources among plants [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study found that AM fungal structures in roots and soil have different responses to biotic and abiotic factors. The AM fungal community structure in roots is mainly affected by host plants and disturbances (grazing), while AM fungi in soil are greatly affected by environmental factors [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be linked to the drop in plant diversity, or the removal of inputs of dung and urine. Also, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can influence the community structure of soil bacteria (Artursson et al, 2006), and the abundance of these fungi has been shown to be higher inside the fences that exclude herbivores and also in the southern sites with fine textured soil and higher phosphorus content (Antoninka et al, 2015;Stevens et al, 2018Stevens et al, , 2020. Future research is needed to understand the mechanisms of the grazing effect and link the mammalian microbiome with the soil microbiome using a timeseries of sampling that coordinates with the grazing cycle in the Serengeti.…”
Section: Large Mammals Leave a Fingerprint On Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%